Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Destinations
USA and CanadaEuropeAustralia and NZAsiaLatin AmericaCaribbean IslandsAfrica
Travel Types
Air TravelCruisesRV Travel

Travel Forum / Travel Types / Air Travel / October 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Why Travelocity Sucks: Sorry the lowest Price has changed...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
bertbarndoor - 24 Oct 2007 19:29 GMT
What the hell, you do a search, you get the price, you click on it,
and then it goes up $300. How annoying is this? What a waste of time.
Travelocity, you officially suck. SHAME ON YOU!!!! Why do you want to
alienate the people who are using your site? Why do you want to waste
our time? Why the bait ans switch? WHY WHY WHY!
Hatunen - 24 Oct 2007 21:23 GMT
>What the hell, you do a search, you get the price, you click on it,
>and then it goes up $300. How annoying is this? What a waste of time.
>Travelocity, you officially suck. SHAME ON YOU!!!! Why do you want to
>alienate the people who are using your site? Why do you want to waste
>our time? Why the bait ans switch? WHY WHY WHY!

That happens on all the sites like Travelocity. Frequently,
they've just sold the last seat at the lower price.

BTW, what's the $300? Is it fees and taxes or an actual fare
change?

Signature

  ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
  *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
  * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

Justin Case - 25 Oct 2007 00:10 GMT
> BTW, what's the $300? Is it fees and taxes or an actual fare
> change?

Probably the TSA surcharge.

--
mrtravel - 25 Oct 2007 05:38 GMT
>>BTW, what's the $300? Is it fees and taxes or an actual fare
>>change?
>
> Probably the TSA surcharge.

Swiss Army kmife surcharge
Rog' - 25 Oct 2007 00:38 GMT
> What the hell, you do a search, you get the price, you click on it,
> and then it goes up $300. How annoying is this? What a waste
> of time.  Travelocity, you officially suck. SHAME ON YOU!!!!
> Why do you want to alienate the people who are using your site?
> Why do you want to waste our time? Why the bait and switch?

You are more likely to find the fare you want if you use the
"flexible dates of travel" feature which show you on which days
(if any) seats at that price can be had.

Those low-ball fares are often either:
1. The fare was valid at one point in time, but no seats for that fare
code are available for your dates of travel.  The fare is still on the
books, but the ~3~ seats alloted for it are gone;
2. For a multi-leg or R/T fare, seats are available for the 1st leg
only, not for connecting or return segments.  Sometimes, only the
1st available fare-code gets quoted.
3.  The fare has day-of-week, time-of-day, length-of-stay or
blackout date restrictions which your dates of travel violated.
mrtravel - 25 Oct 2007 05:36 GMT
> What the hell, you do a search, you get the price, you click on it,
> and then it goes up $300. How annoying is this? What a waste of time.
> Travelocity, you officially suck. SHAME ON YOU!!!! Why do you want to
> alienate the people who are using your site? Why do you want to waste
> our time? Why the bait ans switch? WHY WHY WHY!

Do you think this is the only site this happens on?
TEP - 25 Oct 2007 13:54 GMT
This happens because the search is not performed with up-to-date real-time
data.  It has been reported that it happens most frequently on Orbitz.  It
is called "fare jumping".
Newbie - 25 Oct 2007 16:52 GMT
: What the hell, you do a search, you get the price, you click on it,
: and then it goes up $300. How annoying is this? What a waste of time.

Yes it is frustrating, but travelocity is a global company, not your
neighborhood desk, and it is entirely possible that someone could have
bought those cheaper seats in the meantime.
DevilsPGD - 25 Oct 2007 21:03 GMT
>: What the hell, you do a search, you get the price, you click on it,
>: and then it goes up $300. How annoying is this? What a waste of time.
>
>Yes it is frustrating, but travelocity is a global company, not your
>neighborhood desk, and it is entirely possible that someone could have
>bought those cheaper seats in the meantime.

I've also seen it on routes where I am fairly certain that no one else
was buying -- I tend to book flights at 3 or 4 in the morning, and if
you use the "flexible dates" feature you can sometimes see searches that
were performed recently.

If there is no fare on a date, go do the search manually then go back to
the flexible dates and notice that the price now appears.

I've had cases where there was no other details on a given date until I
did a query for that specific date, then attempted to make a purchase
and gotten the "lowest price has changed", then seen the lowest price
back again a few hours later.  Again, attempting to buy shows that it
has changed.

Personally, I think they're showing prices they know likely won't go
through just to keep eyeballs on their site.

Signature

You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than just a kind word.

Nobody - 25 Oct 2007 21:31 GMT
> Personally, I think they're showing prices they know likely won't go
> through just to keep eyeballs on their site.

This goes all the way back to EaasySabre. They display published fares
received in batch from airlines.  Only once you book do they try to
confirm availability and then tell you that there are no available seats
left. It is a fact of life for mass market systems with large volumes of
 queries that will never yield a booking.

Real travel agents can interrogate available fares on a route on a date
before starting booking process. The dumbed down web based travel
agencies don't do that since it would cost them way too much to have
live inventory queries from many many airlines everytime some user
wanted an idea of fares between A and B.

And it gets worse when they have those "my dates are flexible" since the
web based software will then show you any/all fares published on that
route in roughly the same time period even though even the batch updates
may show all seats usable for a fare being sold out on the date you want.

Once you understand how these systems work, then you understand why they
come to you at the last minute with a "sorry that fare isn't available".
DevilsPGD - 26 Oct 2007 04:38 GMT
>Once you understand how these systems work, then you understand why they
>come to you at the last minute with a "sorry that fare isn't available".

Sure -- What I object to is that once they determine a fare isn't
available, they later show that same fare as being available again.

Signature

You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than just a kind word.

Brian - 26 Oct 2007 20:04 GMT
>Sure -- What I object to is that once they determine a fare isn't
>available, they later show that same fare as being available again.

One time I kept searching for a fare. A number of times it would show
the lower fare but I could never book it. This occurred over a period
of weeks.
mrtravel - 26 Oct 2007 07:33 GMT
>>: What the hell, you do a search, you get the price, you click on it,
>>: and then it goes up $300. How annoying is this? What a waste of time.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I've also seen it on routes where I am fairly certain that no one else
> was buying -- I tend to book flights at 3 or 4 in the morning,

Not that I disagree with some of the other stuff you are saying, but
when it is 3 or 4 in the morning where you are, it is NOT 3 or 4 in the
morning in most other places.
DevilsPGD - 27 Oct 2007 07:50 GMT
>Not that I disagree with some of the other stuff you are saying, but
>when it is 3 or 4 in the morning where you are, it is NOT 3 or 4 in the
>morning in most other places.

True.  However, it is statistically likely that when I am searching for
a flight between a couple smaller cities that are relatively close,
there aren't a whole ton of Aussies searching that route.

Well that, plus I described how I identified that no one else was
searching that same route through Travelocity at that moment.

Signature

You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than just a kind word.

midcopkg@fone.net - 29 Oct 2007 19:22 GMT
> In message <RZmdnVUcMdfOF7zanZ2dnUVZ_rfin...@comcast.com> mrtravel
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> --
> You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than just a kind word.

Travelocity is no better than any other travel site, really.  I just
saw an article by a guy who was a travel agent and fired for no
apparent reason.  So he's getting revenge by posting everything he has
learned on the inside for the general public to see.  It's amazing
what he's telling, how to get cheaper everything!  There are so many
tricks to the travel biz and he's doing this on purpose.  But there is
no way he can be shut up.  See it at: www.columbinetravel.biz  and see
what you think too.  I'll use his tips from now on to get cheaper
everything.
bertbarndoor - 29 Oct 2007 21:55 GMT
You people are all too accepting!! Give me a break, are you seriously
telling me that it isn't technically feasible to show the actual price
of the fare when, with one more click of the button, I get the ACTUAL
frigging price 2 seconds later? As that guy on TV says, GIVE ME A
BREAK! This is a simple BAIT and SWITCH! My original post stands, why
annoy us like that? And you are right, it isn't only travelocity, but
I am going to single them out anyway. Why? Because I used to think
they were industry leaders and now I think they are a bunch of chumps
for wasting all of our time like this.

Get real, show us the actual price. If you can show us a second later
with one click of a mouse button, then you can show us NOW UP FRONT.
STOP WASTING OUR TIME! You suck Travelocity, you suck.
TEP - 29 Oct 2007 22:49 GMT
> are you seriously telling me that it isn't technically feasible to show
> the actual price of the fare

Well, Yes, I think we are.  Between any 2 airports (more if one is doing a
multi-city search), there are multiple airlines and a variety of possible
connections.  Imagine the time it would take if sites like Travelocity (but,
insert Orbitz, Expedia, etc.) had to go to each possible airline's website
and insert the paramters of your search in order to arrive at possible
itineraries and prices and then display them in some matrix for you to look
at.  Thus, to speed things up to the user, these sites build a large
database a few times during the day and use that for conducting searches.
(Refernce my use of "real-time" in my prior post.)

> with one more click of the button, I get the ACTUAL frigging price 2
> seconds later?

Yes, this can now happen quickly as you have identified a specific flight on
a specific day that can then be input into an airline's database to get a
real-time quote.  If the fare still exists, fine--otherwise this is when you
get the message that the fare no longer exists.

>  This is a simple BAIT and SWITCH!

Well, you are right.  These sites are not upfront with the user on how the
seach is actually performed.

>I used to think they were industry leaders

The industry leader is Orbitz.
Frank F. Matthews - 30 Oct 2007 04:03 GMT
>>are you seriously telling me that it isn't technically feasible to show
>>the actual price of the fare
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> real-time quote.  If the fare still exists, fine--otherwise this is when you
> get the message that the fare no longer exists.

The common complaint is that they do not then use the information to
alter their data but continue to display information which they now know
to be wrong.

>> This is a simple BAIT and SWITCH!
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> The industry leader is Orbitz.
TEP - 29 Oct 2007 22:50 GMT
> are you seriously telling me that it isn't technically feasible to show
> the actual price of the fare

Well, Yes, I think we are.  Between any 2 airports (more if one is doing a
multi-city search), there are multiple airlines and a variety of possible
connections.  Imagine the time it would take if sites like Travelocity (but,
insert Orbitz, Expedia, etc.) had to go to each possible airline's website
and insert the parameters of your search in order to arrive at possible
itineraries and prices and then display them in some matrix for you to look
at.  Thus, to speed things up to the user, these sites build a large
database a few times during the day and use that for conducting searches.
(Reference my use of "real-time" in my prior post.)

> with one more click of the button, I get the ACTUAL frigging price 2
> seconds later?

Yes, this can now happen quickly as you have identified a specific flight on
a specific day that can then be input into an airline's database to get a
real-time quote.  If the fare still exists, fine--otherwise this is when you
get the message that the fare no longer exists.

>  This is a simple BAIT and SWITCH!

Well, you are right.  These sites are not upfront with the user on how the
search is actually performed.

>I used to think they were industry leaders

The industry leader is Orbitz.
branman - 30 Oct 2007 16:12 GMT
> Well, Yes, I think we are.  Between any 2 airports (more if one is doing a
> multi-city search), there are multiple airlines and a variety of possible
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> database a few times during the day and use that for conducting searches.
> (Reference my use of "real-time" in my prior post.)

Sorry, I don't buy it. I can imagine exactly what would be required
from a techincal and design perspective. I work in this area and I can
tell you that what I am suggesting is not only feasible, it isn't even
taxing from a hardware, software, throughput, etc. perspective.
Moreover, I have a fairly extensive background in business and I can
say, with at least some certainty, that the reason these sites don't
show you the complete fare upfront has more to do with studies that
have likely shown customers simply book the 'adjusted' fare rather
than spend all day clicking back and forth on their browsers. My guess
is that they have developed revenue models that support their current
setup. I'm saying that it is a short-sited strategy--after using
Travelocity, I now go to the lowest quoted airline and book directly
with them. Anyhow, I'll get off my gripe-box for now.... I've put it
out there... Regards all.
TEP - 30 Oct 2007 16:18 GMT
> Sorry, I don't buy it. I can imagine exactly what would be required
> from a techincal and design perspective.

You can "imagine" it, but that doesn't make it true.  To quote from here
(http://www.latimes.com/technology/la-tr-internet7aug07,1,6658401.column?coll=la-
headlines-technology
),
"Current technology doesn't allow checking every possible airfare
combination and holding every one of those fares while the customer decides
whether to purchase the ticket."
Rog' - 30 Oct 2007 00:24 GMT
> You people are all too accepting!! Give me a break, are you
> seriously telling me that it isn't technically feasible to show the
> actual price of the fare when, with one more click of the button,
> I get the ACTUAL frigging price 2 seconds later?

As another poster said, you're asking them to interface with
each airline's system and attempt to book every possible flight
combination for available fares, as opposed to published tariffs.
I suppose that is technically possible, but then you'd be here to
whine about how slow the website is.

IMHO, its better to use such sites (Expedia, Orbitz, etc) to
get a list of which airlines fly a particular route an which have
lower fares, as a starting point.  I prefer to book directly with
the airlines themselves, since there's no middle-man in case
of changes and your also get perks like extra FF miles.  =R=
DevilsPGD - 29 Oct 2007 23:02 GMT
>Travelocity is no better than any other travel site, really.

It's great to research options, but only once in my life have I not been
able to get the same or better fares directly from the airline.

This might not hold true for more complex itineraries, but I'm near a
reasonably well connected airport and primarily fly to major cities.

Signature

You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than just a kind word.

Frank F. Matthews - 30 Oct 2007 04:00 GMT
>>In message <RZmdnVUcMdfOF7zanZ2dnUVZ_rfin...@comcast.com> mrtravel
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>Well that, plus I described how I identified that no one else was
>>searching that same route through Travelocity at that moment.

>>You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than just a kind word.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> what you think too.  I'll use his tips from now on to get cheaper
> everything.

Right.  $25 for lots of promises & no examples.
midcopkg@fone.net - 30 Oct 2007 09:54 GMT
> In message <RZmdnVUcMdfOF7zanZ2dnUVZ_rfin...@comcast.com> mrtravel
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> --
> You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than just a kind word.

Travelocity is no better than any other travel site, really.  I just
saw an article by a guy who was a travel agent and fired for no
apparent reason.  So he's getting revenge by posting everything he has
learned on the inside for the general public to see.  It's amazing
what he's telling, how to get cheaper everything!  There are so many
tricks to the travel biz and he's doing this on purpose.  But there is
no way he can be shut up.  See it at: www.columbinetravel.biz  and see
what you think too.  I'll use his tips from now on to get cheaper
everything.
Frank F. Matthews - 30 Oct 2007 17:51 GMT
snip
> Travelocity is no better than any other travel site, really.  I just
> saw an article by a guy who was a travel agent and fired for no
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> what you think too.  I'll use his tips from now on to get cheaper
> everything.

Ah yes the magic send me $25 and I will tell you how to rule the world scam.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.