Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Destinations
USA and CanadaEuropeAustralia and NZAsiaLatin AmericaCaribbean IslandsAfrica
Travel Types
Air TravelCruisesRV Travel

Travel Forum / Travel Types / Air Travel / May 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Memo to American Airlines: You Need a PR Transfusion

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Earl Evleth - 28 May 2008 20:50 GMT
From Businessweek.

Memo to American Airlines: You Need a PR Transfusion

Posted by: David Kiley on May 27

There is much hub-bub over American Airlines¹ $15 fee for a checked bag, and
the PR fallout with consumers.

PR fallout? That would presume that the airlines had any credibility at all
with consumers and business travelers in the first place.

When I hear that businesses have difficulty passing along rising fuel costs
to consumers, I scratch my head. What do people expect when they see gas
rising above $4.00 per gallon? Do they think the price of corn flakes going
by their cars on the highway in a tractor trailer truck paying even more for
diesel fuel isn¹t going to go up?

American is charging $15 per checked bag rather than nosing up ticket prices
for a few reasons. Business travelers on whom they depend hardly ever check
a bag, so they are unaffected. Even if they do check a bag, they don¹t care
because it doesn¹t add up to enough money for most companies paying for
business travel to care.

This is a move to soak non-business travelers, and discourage people from
over-packing, thus reducing weight.

It is a canard to think that most people choose airline flights based on
price when the price between two carriers is within $50.00. People choose
flights based on where they have frequent-flyer accounts, and by schedule
before they start quibbling over $15.00 or even $50.00. Because, even in
hard times, time is worth more than the money. Try and book a flight based
on your time needs, and you would be extremely lucky to find more than one
caarrier choice. True, if you have some time flexibility, you might have a
choice. But more often than not, you get backed into a flight choice based
on scheduling.

Here is a bit of the chatter on the issue at Skytalk.

Weber-Shandwick is allegedly American¹s PR counselor. Here is a memo, for
which I am not going to charge.

Dear Client: Instead of instituting a fee for checked bags, which will be a
lightning rod of bad publicity, please consider burying the cost of rising
fuel in across-the-board ticket price increases. Consumers understand that
many consumer prices are rising because of increasing fuel costs. What they
don¹t like, or understand, is when companies begin charging for items they
have previously gotten for free‹a single checked bag, a soda, a bag of
chips, a WiFi connection, etc. The best solution to this problem is to stay
out of the news, not to lean into it and ask for a pie in the face.

T  http://blogs.businessweek.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/10444.1438613876
John Kulp - 28 May 2008 21:12 GMT
>From Businessweek.

Earl the Idiot is back posting his plagiarisms again.  First, chemical
pollution, now, plagiartistic pollution from the whining moron.

>Memo to American Airlines: You Need a PR Transfusion
>
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
>T  http://blogs.businessweek.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/10444.1438613876
SMS - 29 May 2008 00:06 GMT
<snip>

> Dear Client: Instead of instituting a fee for checked bags, which will be a
> lightning rod of bad publicity, please consider burying the cost of rising
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> chips, a WiFi connection, etc. The best solution to this problem is to stay
> out of the news, not to lean into it and ask for a pie in the face.

Yeah, I saw that. Funny article. I doubt if AA ever consulted their PR
firm prior to instituting the $15 charge.
me - 29 May 2008 13:01 GMT
> From Businessweek.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> PR fallout? That would presume that the airlines had any credibility at all
> with consumers and business travelers in the first place.

[snip]
> It is a canard to think that most people choose airline flights based on
> price when the price between two carriers is within $50.00. People choose
> flights based on where they have frequent-flyer accounts, and by schedule
> before they start quibbling over $15.00 or even $50.00.

  I'd sure like to see evidence of this claim.  All indications I've
seen to date
is that differences as small as $15 can be decisive.  Differences of
$50 can
be as much as 25% of a ticket prices in some markets.  It's probably
10%
minimum of virtually all domestic leisure fares.

> Because, even in
> hard times, time is worth more than the money. Try and book a flight based
> on your time needs, and you would be extremely lucky to find more than one
> caarrier choice. True, if you have some time flexibility, you might have a
> choice. But more often than not, you get backed into a flight choice based
> on scheduling.

 This is true of the business traveler, and understandibly this is
the primary
focus of Business Week magazine.  However, as the article pointed out,
Business travelers are the least sensitive to a baggage fee.

> Here is a bit of the chatter on the issue at Skytalk.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> chips, a WiFi connection, etc. The best solution to this problem is to stay
> out of the news, not to lean into it and ask for a pie in the face.

    AA has basically admitted that it's primary competition is the
Ryan
Air kind of airlines.  Spirit charges a bag fee.  Southwest
discourages
checked baggage.  All the airlines are suffering from the business
model
that was based upon soaking their most profitable customers and
filling
the rest of the plane with the "cattle classes".  They should have
been
basing their model on charging their customers for the services
provided,
and competing on those services, not the price.  Instead they have
fallen
prey to the problem of competing on price, regardless (or in spite of)
quality.  That's a tough game to win because someone can always charge
less, even if it is only for a relatively short time.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.