Newbie question: London to Aberdeen, what's the best way?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
AKT - 24 Jun 2008 20:40 GMT I shall be in London this September, staying in South Croydon, and would like to make a side-trip to Aberdeen for 2-3 days.
I have been to London/Croydon a few times, but have never ventured beyond and would appreciate some travel advice.
Basically, what would be the best way to commute between the two cities? I don't like buses for this kind of distance, and don't want to drive on the wrong side of the road, :) so the choice is between trains and flights.
What is the fare I can expect to pay for trains and planes?
What are good online portals to research and book this journey?
Finally, is the scenery from the train beautiful enough to choose this option even if it is longer and may even be more expensive?
Thanks.
Jack Campin - bogus address - 25 Jun 2008 01:28 GMT > I shall be in London this September, staying in South Croydon, and > would like to make a side-trip to Aberdeen for 2-3 days. > Finally, is the scenery from the train beautiful enough to choose > [the train] even if it is longer and may even be more expensive? The scenery is well worth seeing from Newcastle northwards. South of there you could be pretty much anywhere.
==== j a c k at c a m p i n . m e . u k === <http://www.campin.me.uk> ==== Jack Campin, 11 Third St, Newtongrange EH22 4PU, Scotland == mob 07800 739 557 CD-ROMs and free stuff: Scottish music, food intolerance, and Mac logic fonts
Mike..... - 25 Jun 2008 17:24 GMT Following up to Jack Campin - bogus address
> The scenery is well worth seeing from Newcastle northwards. ish. It seems a pity to keep visiting the UK and only go to Croydon and Aberdeen! If the OP does take the train he should get a seat on the left and peer at the distant mountains beyond the central lowlands of Scotland, would he see Stirling Castle from the train? He will also see the very edge of the Lake district I think (Howgill fells), but no lakes.
 Signature "Mike....."(not "Mike") remove clothing to email
John Levine - 25 Jun 2008 02:56 GMT >What is the fare I can expect to pay for trains and planes? >What are good online portals to research and book this journey? For trains, the one place to look is http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/
There's a few through trains, but you usually have to change trains in Edinburgh, which isn't a big deal. It takes between 7 and 8 hrs each way, fares vary a lot depending on date and time, as low as 18 pounds to 60 pounds each way. (Double that to get dollars.) Most of the trains leave from Kings Cross, and I see there are trains from Croydon to St Pancras which is across the street.
For flying, I like http://www.skyscanner.net. There's a lot of competition on this route, Easyjet, flybe, bmi, and British Airways. Fares vary all over the place. Keep in mind that the cheapest flights tend to leave from the least convenient airports. Getting from Croydon to Gatwick is 15 minutes, but to Stansted or Luton from Croydon will be neither fast nor cheap.
>Finally, is the scenery from the train beautiful enough to choose this >option even if it is longer and may even be more expensive? The Scottish parts are indeed interesting.
R's, John
Louis Krupp - 25 Jun 2008 12:38 GMT > I shall be in London this September, staying in South Croydon, and > would like to make a side-trip to Aberdeen for 2-3 days. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Finally, is the scenery from the train beautiful enough to choose this > option even if it is longer and may even be more expensive? If you take the train, you might consider booking a sleeper in one direction. It's not cheap, but unless you've got friends over there, you'd be paying for a hotel or bed & breakfast room anyway. You get the advantages of traveling by train (you go from city center to city center), and you can sleep for most of the trip and then wake up at your destination.
If the northbound sleeper gets to Aberdeen too early for you to catch some Scottish scenery, you might want to get the sleeper to Edinburgh and then another train to Aberdeen.
Sleepers call at London Euston, which is a few blocks west of St. Pancras. The more direct trains to Edinburgh and Aberdeen call at Kings Cross.
Reasons not to take the sleeper, besides the cost: Sleepers can be noisy. If you have sleep apnea, you may not want to use a CPAP unit with a humidifier on a moving train. Unless you go first class, you're likely to be sharing a cabin with a stranger.
Louis
Mike..... - 25 Jun 2008 17:05 GMT Following up to AKT
> Finally, is the scenery from the train beautiful enough to choose this > option even if it is longer and may even be more expensive? I always drive but much of the rail is near the road, the scenery is midlands and east coast, so not that fantastic to worry about. Choose whichever suits you best for other reasons. (all the best scenery in UK is on the west coasts).
 Signature "Mike....."(not "Mike") remove clothing to email
Bob Fusillo - 27 Jun 2008 14:25 GMT > Basically, what would be the best way to commute between the two > cities? I don't like buses for this kind of distance, and don't want to > drive on the wrong side of the road, :) so the choice is between trains > and flights. Because of the layout of the roads and the example and influence of fellow drivers fore and aft, driving on the left is really quite quick to adapt to. As far as the cars are concerned, the "mirror image" makes driving easy too. I am recently surprised by the large number of "Drive on the left" signs all over the place -- aimed primarily at Continental Europeans. Drivng a rental ( AutoEurope is often the cheapest) would be much cheaper than train or plane, and would give you much more freedom. But the motorways are not particularly scenic, and in much of England the heavy traffic makes attention to the road more important than looking about. London to Aberdeen will take 8 to 9 hours of driving, with nice scenery above Edinburgh. No matter how you go, you will kill a day each way unless you take a nite train. rjf
Mike..... - 27 Jun 2008 14:32 GMT Following up to Bob Fusillo
> As far as the cars are concerned, the "mirror image" makes driving easy too. this is my experience too, with the "correct" car its easy.
> I am recently surprised by the large number of "Drive on the left" signs all > over the place -- aimed primarily at Continental Europeans. all over here in their polish etc left hand drives.........
 Signature "Mike....."(not "Mike") remove clothing to email
John Levine - 27 Jun 2008 15:10 GMT >> cities? I don't like buses for this kind of distance, and don't want to >> drive on the wrong side of the road, :) so the choice is between trains >> and flights. >> >Because of the layout of the roads and the example and influence of fellow >drivers fore and aft, driving on the left is really quite quick to adapt to. At least until you get to the roundabouts, if you're not used to them. I was particularly impressed by a set of six of them in Luton connected in a circle, sort of like an asphalt benzene ring.
Also keep in mind that driving in the UK is quite expensive. The rentals are pricey, and fuel is really pricey. I filled up the tank of a friend's Honda Civic two weeks ago and it cost $100.
I'd take the train or fly.
R's, John
AES - 27 Jun 2008 17:32 GMT > >Because of the layout of the roads and the example and influence of fellow > >drivers fore and aft, driving on the left is really quite quick to adapt to. Yes and no.
I once lived for 6 weeks in Virginia Water, on a house-and-car exchange arrangement with the homeowner there. As noted above, getting used to highway driving was not too bad. It was the intersections and pulling into or out of parking lots and driveways -- what lane to make a right or left turn into? which way to look for other traffic? -- that really brought the instinctive (and therefore wrong) reactions.
The worst time was pulling out of the gas, sorry, petrol station after the first time we had to fill up. We wanted head to the right; naturally I turned right out of the station, into the right lane.
mrtravel - 28 Jun 2008 06:12 GMT >>Basically, what would be the best way to commute between the two >>cities? I don't like buses for this kind of distance, and don't want to [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > ( AutoEurope is often the cheapest) would be much cheaper than train or > plane, and would give you much more freedom. With fuel prices for a round trip from London to Aberdeen, plus the car costs, would it really be cheaper?
Gregory Morrow - 28 Jun 2008 18:28 GMT Shut up, lamer...
 Signature Best Greg
" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that we are some kind of comedy team turns my stomach." - "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking
> >>Basically, what would be the best way to commute between the two > >>cities? I don't like buses for this kind of distance, and don't want to [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > With fuel prices for a round trip from London to Aberdeen, plus the car > costs, would it really be cheaper? AKT - 27 Jun 2008 18:13 GMT Thank you so much for all the helpful information. We have pretty much ruled out driving and buses. In an attempt to balance competing pulls, I am attracted to the idea ofa train one way and flight the other. In that connection:
(1) Haven't decided if upon reaching LHR I should fly directly to Aberdeen, or go to South Croydon to rest one day and then go to Aberdeen.
However, as many cheap flights seem to use alternate airports, how easy ale LGW and Luton to reach from LHR? From East Croydon station (ie, form any place reachable by tube)?
(2) I looked at 1-way train fares and only high fares were offered. For example ABD -> London was GBP 116.
OTOH, if I searched for round trip, then GBP 32 each way was available.
Is this normal, or am I doing something wrong?
John Levine - 27 Jun 2008 18:37 GMT >However, as many cheap flights seem to use alternate airports, how easy >ale LGW and Luton to reach from LHR? From East Croydon station (ie, >form any place reachable by tube)? Sheesh, can't you look at a map? Gatwick and Croydon are close to ech other south of London. There's frequent train service, taking 15 minutes for fast trains and 30 minutes for slow ones.
Luton is on the other side of London, but is reasonably easy to get to because for some reason there are direct trains from East Croydon to Luton Airport Parkway, where you catch a shuttle bus to the airport. That takes more like an hour and a half.
>(2) I looked at 1-way train fares and only high fares were offered. For >example ABD -> London was GBP 116. > >OTOH, if I searched for round trip, then GBP 32 each way was available. > >Is this normal, or am I doing something wrong? It's normal yield management. Feel free to discard the return.
R's, John
|
|
|