For mileage programs, the worst is yet to come
The Extra Mile
by Tim Winship - June 17, 2008
http://www.smartertravel.com/travel-advice/for-mileage-programs-the-worst-is-yet
-to-come.html?id=2610832&source=milealert&value=2008-06-17+00%3A00%3A00&u=SL4F6B
4DC5
There has been plenty of bad news for members of the airlines' mileage
programs in recent months. New fees have been imposed, and old fees
have been increased. Award levels have been raised. And two airlines,
United and US Airways, have scrapped their longstanding policies of
awarding a minimum of 500 miles for short-haul flights.
But even worse news lies ahead, and it has nothing to do with changes
to the programs' terms and conditions.
Slammed by soaring fuel costs on one side, and squeezed by slumping
demand on the other, the airlines have pinned their hopes for survival
on downsizing—shrinking into profitability.
Advertisement
* American, the world's largest airline, has announced plans to
reduce capacity 11 to 12 percent later this year, and eliminate
thousands of jobs.
* United, the nation's second-largest carrier, plans to ground 100
planes, reducing domestic mainline capacity by 17 to 18 percent, and
cut 1,400 to 1,600 jobs.
* Continental will shed 3,000 jobs—more than 6 percent of its
workforce—and reduce capacity by 11 percent this fall.
* And Delta will cut U.S. capacity by 10 percent in the second
half of 2008.
Capacity recalibrations are in store for the discount carriers as
well.
* AirTran will defer delivery of 18 Boeing 737s.
* JetBlue recently delayed the purchase of 21 Airbus 320 jets.
* And Spirit is considering laying off up to 60 percent of its
flight attendants and 45 percent of its pilots.
By no means is the shrink-to-survive strategy confined to the U.S.
airlines, any more than the causes of the contraction are specific to
the U.S.
* Ryanair, Europe's largest low-cost airline, will ground 10
percent of its fleet this winter.
* Australian carrier Qantas will cut flights by 5 percent.
Other non-U.S. carriers are expected to follow suit.
So far, there are no credible estimates of the total reduction in
flights over the coming months. But this we know: A year from now,
there will be significantly fewer flights than there are today.
As has already been reported at length by industry-watchers, the
flight cutbacks will result in the loss of service to smaller
airports, more crowded planes, further erosion of customer service,
and of course, higher ticket prices.
What has not yet been considered is the impact of fewer flights on
frequent flyer programs.
Here's how the big picture will affect the small picture.
All things being equal, a 10 percent reduction in seats overall will
translate into a 10 percent reduction in award seats. Unless, that is,
the airlines increase the percentage of seats they reserve for mileage
redemption. The more likely scenario, though, given the airlines'
desperation to stave off bankruptcy, is that they will reduce not only
the absolute number of award seats but the percentage of award seats
as well.
Meanwhile, on the demand side of the equation, the trillions of miles
in the accounts of tens of millions of frequent flyer program
participants aren't disappearing. On the contrary, even as the supply
of award seats shrinks, the airlines continue expanding their
programs, giving consumers ever more ways to earn miles.
The resulting picture is a troubling one: more miles chasing fewer
seats.
Over the past year, major airlines have revised their programs'
mileage-expiration policies, reducing from three years to 24 or 18
months the period during which program members must have activity in
order to keep their accounts active. That will eventually wipe a
relatively small number of the outstanding miles off the airlines'
books, marginally reducing their financial exposure from award
liability.
But in the long run, spiffing up the airlines' balance sheets won't
address the key issue of award availability. Consumers participate in
frequent flyer programs with the expectation that they'll have a
reasonable chance of redeeming their miles for a free flight.
As airlines downsize to survive, that expectation is looking
increasingly unrealistic.
jessica_smith_nyc - 28 Jun 2008 22:52 GMT
Does this effect previous earned mile?
----
http://www.moviesitearchive.com/travel
> For mileage programs, the worst is yet to come
> The Extra Mile
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
> As airlines downsize to survive, that expectation is looking
> increasingly unrealistic.
Jim Davis - 28 Jun 2008 23:07 GMT
>Does this effect previous earned mile?
It will. Besides the fee raises, you're going to find yourself spending
more miles for a flight.
yd+yg+as - 28 Jun 2008 23:28 GMT
On 6/28/2008 2:52 PM jessica_smith_nyc ignored two million years of
human evolution to write:
> Does this effect previous earned mile?
Depends on the airline mileage program, and how often the airlines
decide to update requirements, including any exipration of unused
mileage points. When in doubt, contact the airline's mileage program
directly.
tim..... - 29 Jun 2008 13:07 GMT
Does this effect previous earned mile?
Given that the post was about the airlines reducing the number of total
flights (and hence seats) available, of course it will.
tim
SMS - 29 Jun 2008 08:24 GMT
> But in the long run, spiffing up the airlines' balance sheets won't
> address the key issue of award availability. Consumers participate in
> frequent flyer programs with the expectation that they'll have a
> reasonable chance of redeeming their miles for a free flight.
One key thing to do is to avoid airline credit cards as a way to get
miles, and switch to a card that doesn't have restrictions on airlines,
flights, or seat availability. I have one card that gives a domestic
ticket of up to $500 for every $25,000 charged, so each $1 charged has a
value of 2% if you spend the full $500 on a ticket. Of course with the
new Countrywide Visa's flat 2% cash rebate, you're better off not doing
the airline mile thing anyway, at least until they get rid of this deal.
VS - 29 Jun 2008 18:53 GMT
>One key thing to do is to avoid airline credit cards as a way to get
>miles, and switch to a card that doesn't have restrictions on airlines,
>flights, or seat availability.
Typically bad advice. These so-called ``no-restrictions'' cards don't
even give airline miles. They give fairly useless points, which:
- Cannot be combined with miles accumulated from flying
(this alone should be the deal-killer).
- Cannot be used for upgrades.
- Cannot be used for long-haul business- and first-class tickets,
except at insane conversion rates.
Since the latter two are the best uses of airline miles, the
``no-restrictions'' cards are to be avoided like a plague.
>I have one card that gives a domestic
>ticket of up to $500 for every $25,000 charged
With an airline credit card, $25,000 charged would yield enough miles
for a transatlantic business-class upgrade, worth much more than $500.
>Of course with the
>new Countrywide Visa's flat 2% cash rebate, you're better off not doing
>the airline mile thing anyway
Terrible advice. 2% cash rebate is simply not competitive with properly
used airline miles or hotel points. For example, $80,000 charged to
a Starwood AmEx gives enough miles for a transatlantic business-class
ticket on most airlines (in reality, you'd need to charge much less,
because miles can be put into an existing account, and airlines like
BA often run 2-for-1 promotions).
With 2% cashback, $80,000 charged would result in piddly $1,600 cash -
not nearly enough for a business-class ticket.
Sharkbait - 08 Jul 2008 04:24 GMT
Ablang wrote,
>For mileage programs, the worst is yet to come
Exactly, with my US Air Dividend Miles award to Asia confirmed this evening,
I will be dumping my US Airways Dividends VISA card and their program. It
has been difficult to get a decent business class award with these birds,
but I finally snagged a couple C class tickets on Asiana, open JAW
(LAX-HAN - SGN-LAX) to use 240,000 miles of my 241,000 in the bank. They
can keep the 1,000 miles for all the crap I've had to put up with this
program.
I have AA miles to use up and I am done.
There are better alternatives.
rg