Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Destinations
USA and CanadaEuropeAustralia and NZAsiaLatin AmericaCaribbean IslandsAfrica
Travel Types
Air TravelCruisesRV Travel

Travel Forum / Travel Types / Air Travel / November 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Notebooks in flight

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Alfred Molon - 18 Nov 2008 23:00 GMT
Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
weak to cause any problems to the plane electronics.
Signature


Alfred Molon
http://www.molon.de - Photos of Asia, Africa and Europe

Traveller - 19 Nov 2008 00:06 GMT
> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
> weak to cause any problems to the plane electronics.

It's actually nothing to do with the device.  They don't want you distracted
by your notebook/iPod/Nintendo DS/whatever if there's an emergency and you
have to get out in a hurry.
Irwell - 19 Nov 2008 00:13 GMT
> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
> weak to cause any problems to the plane electronics.

One notebook maybe, but 50 to 100 could cause some beat frequency
problems with the avionics.
John Kulp - 19 Nov 2008 00:42 GMT
>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
>> weak to cause any problems to the plane electronics.
>
>One notebook maybe, but 50 to 100 could cause some beat frequency
>problems with the avionics.

Baloney.  This has been proven to be completely false again and again.
More than likely, they are concerned someone would get injured if they
suddenly had to stop and don't want to be liable.  It has nothing to
do with electronics.
Irwell - 19 Nov 2008 03:01 GMT
>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Baloney.  This has been proven to be completely false again and again.

Not asking about your state of mind here.
They, the people who really know, require that all electronic devices
be powered down during the landing and take off phases of the flight.
They don't want to take chances with passenger's electronics that may
not be assembled and tested to FCC/FAA standards, including radiation
hardness.
John Kulp - 19 Nov 2008 04:42 GMT
>>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>not be assembled and tested to FCC/FAA standards, including radiation
>hardness.

Sure and cellphones do the same thing according to the same ones that
believe this.  Also, having been proven to be completely false.  The
reason, as everyone else knows, is to prevent liability for these
things flying around the cabin in case of a sudden stop.
Chris Blunt - 19 Nov 2008 05:42 GMT
>>>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>>>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>reason, as everyone else knows, is to prevent liability for these
>things flying around the cabin in case of a sudden stop.

For years the airlines have been telling people to keep their
cellphones switched off at all times while on board the aircraft. Now
that they've found a way to make extra money by allowing passengers to
use their cellphones in flight, these things will suddenly be deemed
quite safe to use.

Chris
John Kulp - 19 Nov 2008 17:42 GMT
>>>>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>>>>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>use their cellphones in flight, these things will suddenly be deemed
>quite safe to use.

Hopefully not, or there are going to be lots of fights on board.
Chris Blunt - 19 Nov 2008 20:47 GMT
>>>>>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>>>>>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>Hopefully not, or there are going to be lots of fights on board.

I believe that Emirates and Malaysia Airlines already allow them on
some flights. Ryanair have announced they intend to as well.

Chris
PeterL - 19 Nov 2008 23:01 GMT
> >>>>>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
> >>>>>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Chris-

During take offs and landings?  Or just during flight?  Big difference.
Chris Blunt - 20 Nov 2008 03:04 GMT
>> >>>>>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>> >>>>>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
>During take offs and landings?  Or just during flight?  Big difference.

I don't know, but cellphones had previous been disallowed at any time
on aircraft on the basis that they were a risk to flight systems. The
point is that now that the airlines have discovered they can make
money from their use, they are apparently no longer considered a
danger.

Chris
Kurt Ullman - 20 Nov 2008 11:34 GMT
> I don't know, but cellphones had previous been disallowed at any time
> on aircraft on the basis that they were a risk to flight systems. The
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Chris

 The cell phone concerns have always been FCC instead of FAA. Not to
say that the FAA may not have had some, just that the FCC weigh in made
it unnecessary for the FAA to make any kind of decision.
Tom P - 19 Nov 2008 06:21 GMT
>>>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>>>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> reason, as everyone else knows, is to prevent liability for these
> things flying around the cabin in case of a sudden stop.

Are you saying that they are less dangerous when they are switched off?
And exactly how dangerous is my Nanopod as a flying object?

T.
John Kulp - 19 Nov 2008 17:43 GMT
>>>>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>>>>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>Are you saying that they are less dangerous when they are switched off?
>And exactly how dangerous is my Nanopod as a flying object?

Very, if it flew out of your hand and hit someone in the temple.
Irwell - 19 Nov 2008 15:55 GMT
>>>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>>>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> reason, as everyone else knows, is to prevent liability for these
> things flying around the cabin in case of a sudden stop.

Weak argument, put away your 10 ounce cell phone, but you can carry on
reading your 2 lb book.
John Kulp - 19 Nov 2008 17:44 GMT
>>>>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>>>>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>Weak argument, put away your 10 ounce cell phone, but you can carry on
>reading your 2 lb book.

We're talking only about takeoff and landing here.  You're not allowed
to have anything not stored on those.  And won't if they see them.
Chris Blunt - 19 Nov 2008 05:42 GMT
>>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>not be assembled and tested to FCC/FAA standards, including radiation
>hardness.

The only "people who really know" are those who have carried out
actual tests, and so far those tests have failed to show any adverse
effects from using notebook computers. Those who make these rules are
"people who don't really know", so they just err on the side of
caution.

Chris
Irwell - 19 Nov 2008 15:49 GMT
>>>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>>>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Chris

Not quite true Chris, just have a look at the NASA website
for information on how 'consumer electronics' have intefered
with avionics systems.
John Kulp - 19 Nov 2008 17:41 GMT
>>>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>>>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>"people who don't really know", so they just err on the side of
>caution.

As far as this issue is concerned, yes.  But not as far as keeping
them from flying around the cabin.  That's a valid issue.

>Chris
Jim Davis - 19 Nov 2008 02:15 GMT
>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
>> weak to cause any problems to the plane electronics.
>
> One notebook maybe, but 50 to 100 could cause some beat frequency
> problems with the avionics.

Not really.  For example, think about the WN flight that overshot the runway
at MDW.  If 30 people had laptops out for use, they would have had 30
missiles streaking through the cabin. (Among other things.)
jamoran - 21 Nov 2008 02:47 GMT
never a problem with laptop or GPS in my plane and anything I bring on
board, laptop, cell phone, gps, etc sits right in front of the avionics

on any airliner, you are usually a minimum of 10-15 feet from the
cockpit unless you are on a "puddle jumper" or Dash aircraft.

can you walk and chew gum ??

Pilots do that all the time{

1) talk to ATC
2) watch out for traffic
3) control the airplane
4) navigate

>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
>> weak to cause any problems to the plane electronics.
>
> One notebook maybe, but 50 to 100 could cause some beat frequency
> problems with the avionics.

Signature

   JOHN
john@analon.com
888-5-analon (888-526-2566)

computers (unix admin), chemistry, and Freggs too
I make it work. X-windows, not MSW !

John Kulp - 19 Nov 2008 00:41 GMT
>Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
>weak to cause any problems to the plane electronics.

It is and has been proven over and over to be the case.  It's mindless
bureaucracy rambling on.  Someone came up with this before they
bothered to study it and it has been around ever since.
PeterL - 19 Nov 2008 01:09 GMT
> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
> weak to cause any problems to the plane electronics.
> --
>
> Alfred Molonhttp://www.molon.de- Photos of Asia, Africa and Europe

If they want you to put everything away and store all your stuff under
you seat, why would they then allow you to hold a piece of hardware on
your lap?  It may be thrown around in turbulance and hurt someone.
Jim Davis - 19 Nov 2008 02:23 GMT
On Nov 18, 3:00 pm, Alfred Molon <alfred_mo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
> weak to cause any problems to the plane electronics.
> --
>
> Alfred Molonhttp://www.molon.de- Photos of Asia, Africa and Europe

>If they want you to put everything away and store all your stuff under
>you seat, why would they then allow you to hold a piece of hardware on
>your lap?  It may be thrown around in turbulance and hurt someone.

Everything has to be stowed as not to become a deadly flying object in the
event of an accident.  The crazy part is, you can have an infant on your
lap.
Irwell - 19 Nov 2008 15:57 GMT
> On Nov 18, 3:00 pm, Alfred Molon <alfred_mo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> event of an accident.  The crazy part is, you can have an infant on your
> lap.

Don't worry about the infant, watch out for disposable pampers.
John Kulp - 19 Nov 2008 17:44 GMT
>> On Nov 18, 3:00 pm, Alfred Molon <alfred_mo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Don't worry about the infant, watch out for disposable pampers.

Who Flung Poo?
Mythbuster - 20 Nov 2008 17:18 GMT
>> On Nov 18, 3:00 pm, Alfred Molon <alfred_mo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Don't worry about the infant, watch out for disposable pampers.

Kulp was one of those infants who flew through the cabin on a sudden stop.
Landed on his head.  They had to remove his tongue, but the doctors replaced
it with his sphincter.  That's why nothing but sh.t comes out when he talks.
John Kulp - 20 Nov 2008 19:18 GMT
>>> On Nov 18, 3:00 pm, Alfred Molon <alfred_mo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>Landed on his head.  They had to remove his tongue, but the doctors replaced
>it with his sphincter.  That's why nothing but sh.t comes out when he talks.

Sure sh.t for brains.  Explain to everyone why this crackpot who
wanted to get FAs fired for her selfish, stupid needs.  You know, sh.t
for brains.  The one where she was too cheap--no doubt like a moron
like you--to PAY for what she wanted.  Stupid sh.t.
Mythbuster - 21 Nov 2008 16:54 GMT
>>Kulp was one of those infants who flew through the cabin on a sudden stop.
>>Landed on his head.  They had to remove his tongue, but the doctors
>>replaced
>>it with his sphincter.  That's why nothing but sh.t comes out when he
>>talks.

> Sure sh.t for brains.  Explain to everyone why this crackpot who
> wanted to get FAs fired for her selfish, stupid needs.  You know, sh.t
> for brains.  The one where she was too cheap--no doubt like a moron
> like you--to PAY for what she wanted.  Stupid sh.t.

That's another thread dipshit.  Try to keep up.  Another game on TV?  Drunk
again? Figures.
Alfred Molon - 19 Nov 2008 07:00 GMT
In article <1caa1932-c33e-4c52-85c0-
4bcba441cfff@f37g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, PeterL says...

> If they want you to put everything away and store all your stuff under
> you seat, why would they then allow you to hold a piece of hardware on
> your lap?  It may be thrown around in turbulance and hurt someone.

Hmmm... you are allowed to keep the notebook on your lap if it is
switched off.
Signature


Alfred Molon
http://www.molon.de - Photos of Asia, Africa and Europe

DevilsPGD - 19 Nov 2008 21:54 GMT
>In article <1caa1932-c33e-4c52-85c0-
>4bcba441cfff@f37g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, PeterL says...
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Hmmm... you are allowed to keep the notebook on your lap if it is
>switched off.

Some flight attendants will permit it, but this is not formally allowed.
PeterL - 19 Nov 2008 23:01 GMT
> In message <MPG.238dd7deb697be498b...@news.supernews.com> Alfred Molon
> <alfred_mo...@yahoo.com> was claimed to have wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Some flight attendants will permit it, but this is not formally allowed.

During take offs and landings?  Or just during flight?
Jim Davis - 20 Nov 2008 02:13 GMT
On Nov 19, 1:54 pm, DevilsPGD <spam_narf_s...@crazyhat.net> wrote:
> In message <MPG.238dd7deb697be498b...@news.supernews.com> Alfred Molon
> <alfred_mo...@yahoo.com> was claimed to have wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Some flight attendants will permit it, but this is not formally allowed.

During take offs and landings?  Or just during flight?

During take off and landings, they'll require you to stow everything.  Most
of the airlines are making a point to tell you that laptops in the seatback
pouch is not allowed either.

If you watch, you'll also see the FA's taking purses and other items from
people in the bulkhead seats.  They tell them the items have to be stowed
for takeoff & landing, but they can remove them from storage during the
flight.
Tom P - 20 Nov 2008 17:20 GMT
> On Nov 19, 1:54 pm, DevilsPGD <spam_narf_s...@crazyhat.net> wrote:
>> In message <MPG.238dd7deb697be498b...@news.supernews.com> Alfred Molon
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> for takeoff & landing, but they can remove them from storage during the
> flight.

That might be true for seats next to the emergency exits, but I have
never ever heard or seen that on any other occasion. What kind or
airline do you fly with?
AES - 20 Nov 2008 20:17 GMT
> > If you watch, you'll also see the FA's taking purses and other items from
> > people in the bulkhead seats.  They tell them the items have to be stowed
> > for takeoff & landing, but they can remove them from storage during the
> > flight.

> That might be true for seats next to the emergency exits, but I have
> never ever heard or seen that on any other occasion. What kind or
> airline do you fly with?

Sorry, I've seen this happen with bulkhead (i.e., very front row) seats
on _many_ occasions -- in fact, I'd say, near universally, whenever
there is no seat and hence no "space under the seat" in front of you.

The cabin crew will more or less universally require that computer bags,
briefcases, backpacks, maybe even sizable purses, anything down by your
feet, be stowed overhead during takeoff and during landing.

If you happen to have a small laptop out in flight, and there's a
sizable pocket for magazines on the wall in front of you, you may be
able to get away with stowing the laptop in it, or hiding it beside you,
down next to the arm rest -- or maybe even hold it on your lap -- and
you may be able to get away with not stowing it; but if they see it (and
they do look carefully), it'll have to go overhead.
Irwell - 20 Nov 2008 20:53 GMT
>>> If you watch, you'll also see the FA's taking purses and other items from
>>> people in the bulkhead seats.  They tell them the items have to be stowed
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> you may be able to get away with not stowing it; but if they see it (and
> they do look carefully), it'll have to go overhead.

We have flown bulkhead seats many times, and on different airlines,
and every time without exception the flight attendants have taken
our bags and purses, and stowed them in the overhead bins during take off
and landing, gets a bit paranoic for ladies to be separated from their
handbags, but everybody is strapped in anyway.
jamoran - 21 Nov 2008 00:00 GMT
never had any problem. I will put the laptop on the floor or put in a
bag and put behind my legs if I have to...

On planes, I need to remember to kick out or disable my network card or
as it will continiously try and find a network much like a cell phone
will keep looking for a cellular tower

>>>> If you watch, you'll also see the FA's taking purses and other items from
>>>> people in the bulkhead seats.  They tell them the items have to be stowed
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> and landing, gets a bit paranoic for ladies to be separated from their
> handbags, but everybody is strapped in anyway.

Signature

   JOHN
john@analon.com
888-5-analon (888-526-2566)

computers (unix admin), chemistry, and Freggs too
I make it work. X-windows, not MSW !

Donald Newcomb - 19 Nov 2008 23:25 GMT
> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
> weak to cause any problems to the plane electronics.

I think the appropriate answer is, "Because the flight crew tell you not
to." I was once on a military flight where a high-ranking military officer
insisted on standing during the take off and landing. No one was going to
tell a "three star" to sit down but I think it would have been funny if the
plane had blown a tire and thrown him through the window.  When a plane is
taking off or landing you are supposed to be strapped in with your tray
table and seat back up and not messing with anything that could cause injury
if "stuff" happened. It would be just my luck to be sitting in front of or
behind Alfred when the plane took a bounce and have his laptop ricochet off
the overhead and come down on top of me.

Also, while a *properly functioning* laptop might not cause any problems
with the plane's electronics, you should not attempt to assert that an
improperly functioning one would never do so. During take-off and landing
there is no time to look for and isolate the source of a problem. It's best
to be safe. I'm just glad they let us use them at all.

Signature

Donald R. Newcomb
DRNewcomb (at) attglobal.net

Tom P - 20 Nov 2008 17:27 GMT
>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> there is no time to look for and isolate the source of a problem. It's best
> to be safe. I'm just glad they let us use them at all.

 I don't think the plane's electronics is a problem, if anything it
might be the RF noise interference making voice communication more
difficult for the pilots. Aircraft radio still uses AM modulation.
Irwell - 20 Nov 2008 20:49 GMT
>>> Why exactly are you not allowed to use a notebook computer during take-
>>> off and landing? The radio power emitted by a notebook should be too
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> might be the RF noise interference making voice communication more
> difficult for the pilots. Aircraft radio still uses AM modulation.

More, or less a flying Faraday Cage.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.