>I watched it on a BBC live internet video feed.
>
>Looked a lot like an airplane taking off.
> I didn't watch long enough to see - but I presume the other
> critical operation occurred, and they saw an aircraft land
> safely sometime later?
It looked like they planned to land very soon after, as the wheels stayed
out for the duration of the takeoff I saw on TV.
ant
James Robinson - 27 Apr 2005 14:15 GMT
> > I didn't watch long enough to see - but I presume the other
> > critical operation occurred, and they saw an aircraft land
> > safely sometime later?
>
> It looked like they planned to land very soon after, as the wheels stayed
> out for the duration of the takeoff I saw on TV.
It landed four hours later.
Tom Peel - 27 Apr 2005 14:21 GMT
>>I didn't watch long enough to see - but I presume the other
>>critical operation occurred, and they saw an aircraft land
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> ant
Being the first ever flight, they had plenty of other things to check
before they retracted the wheels- everything in the right order, please!
Apparently, on this first flight they also tested maximum speed with
wheels extended, and minimum clean speed behaviour. There's a whole
2,000 hours of testing to go, this was just the first 4 hours.
T.
Peter - 28 Apr 2005 00:26 GMT
> > I didn't watch long enough to see - but I presume the other
> > critical operation occurred, and they saw an aircraft land
> > safely sometime later?
>
> It looked like they planned to land very soon after, as the wheels stayed
> out for the duration of the takeoff I saw on TV.
They didn't have any passengers aboard either. A very non-standard
airliner departure.
Pete, looking forward to making Sydney-London in one hop
Ralph Holz - 28 Apr 2005 15:57 GMT
Hi,
> They didn't have any passengers aboard either. A very non-standard
> airliner departure.
Of course, it makes such *sense* to have passengers on board your very first
test flight.
Ralph

Signature
For contact details, please see www.ralphholz.de.
Peter - 29 Apr 2005 02:09 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Of course, it makes such *sense* to have passengers on board your very first
> test flight.
The point I was making was that it WAS a test flight. Cranking the
wheels up as soon as you leave the runway is something we're all used to
seeing on a routine flight.
There's another logical possibility, an airplane refusing to land, it's
much worse than one that refusing to take-off.
During landing, the A380's wing seems to be generated so much lift in
comparison of its current weight, that it looks like it almost
overshoot the runway if the pilots didn't forced it to land.
A Guy Called Tyketto - 27 Apr 2005 21:29 GMT
> There's another logical possibility, an airplane refusing to land, it's
> much worse than one that refusing to take-off.
>
> During landing, the A380's wing seems to be generated so much lift in
> comparison of its current weight, that it looks like it almost
> overshoot the runway if the pilots didn't forced it to land.
Are you talking about the actual landing, or the fly-by that it
did before circling to land? If you're meaning the fly-by, that was
intentional.
BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email: tyketto@sbcglobal.net
Unix Systems Administrator, | tyketto@ozemail.com.au
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! :) | http://www.sbcglobal.net/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF