"Adam Weiss" wrote...
> But it was all overshadowed by the check in areas.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> descended into the same chaos that reigned the SuperDome during Katrina.
> It was that bad.
> "Adam Weiss" wrote...
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> (A) The check in areas were not going to lose power until the winds from the
> hurricane arrived.
Point taken. Let me reword my statement (see below).
> (B) Hours before - in this case 12 or so - FLIGHTIOPS would have been
> secured; everything able to fly out dispatched either in regular service or
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> the hurricane's arrival to shut down and secure. IAH and HOU waited about
> as late as circumstances would have permitted.
> TMO
A well managed evacuation preceeds an anticipated natural disaster like
a hurricane by 48 to 72 hours. Using your numbers, an airport being
used for evacuation should be helping people evacuate for all but the
last 12 hours of that time window.
Whether or not airport management wanted it to be used that way, IAH was
used as a means of evacuation by hundreds if not thousands. And with
the exception of the check-in areas things went very smoothly. All I'm
saying is that the airport should step back and look at what can be done
better, particularly in the check-in areas, for the next evacuation.
> Try DFW some afternoon when a line of thunderstorms sweeps through.
> Now there's a couple of hours of unreined chaos a'brew.
I've been stuck in LGA for 9 hours during thunderstorms.
That airport (LGA) is so woefully inadequate even during normal
operations that I shudder to think what would happen if it were relied
upon for evacuations. IAH was comparatively very well run. But as with
any big experience (like the evacuation of Houston last week) lessons
should be learned.