Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Destinations
USA and CanadaEuropeAustralia and NZAsiaLatin AmericaCaribbean IslandsAfrica
Travel Types
Air TravelCruisesRV Travel

Travel Forum / Travel Types / Air Travel / May 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Stinko flight

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
HLS@nospam.nix - 13 May 2006 23:06 GMT
The global carriers need to enact a rule that people who arrive at a flight
with unacceptable personal hygiene will not be allowed to board unless and
until
they clean up their act.

I understand that people who are on long connecting flights cannot be as
pristine as daisies, but -DAMN- some of these people bring tears to your
eyes,
and I dont believe it is anything but cultural nastiness.

I suspect that you all, who have made long international flights, have been
'offended' by this sort of passenger before.

Cant something be done??
mgrahm@trib.com - 13 May 2006 23:41 GMT
>I suspect that you all, who have made long international flights, have been
'offended' by this sort of passenger before.

Yes I have, but was lucky enough not to have to set by them. Just
wondered if they knew what soap and water were.

>Cant something be done??

Bring a can of air freshener.
Maxx - 13 May 2006 23:43 GMT
> The global carriers need to enact a rule that people who arrive at a flight
> with unacceptable personal hygiene will not be allowed to board unless and
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Cant something be done??

Bring it to the attention of the FA & request to be reseated.
Something should be done.  I believe the smelly one will be ejected if
it is brought to the attention of the crew.  If nothing is said,
nothing will be done.
yaofeng - 30 May 2006 14:41 GMT
> > The global carriers need to enact a rule that people who arrive at a flight
> > with unacceptable personal hygiene will not be allowed to board unless and
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> it is brought to the attention of the crew.  If nothing is said,
> nothing will be done.

Reseating is likely not an option these days.  Most of the flights are
full.
JohnT - 30 May 2006 15:31 GMT
>> > The global carriers need to enact a rule that people who arrive at a
>> > flight
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Reseating is likely not an option these days.  Most of the flights are
> full.

And I do hope that whoever gets ejected is provided with a parachute.

JohnT
Maxx - 30 May 2006 22:59 GMT
> > > The global carriers need to enact a rule that people who arrive at a flight
> > > with unacceptable personal hygiene will not be allowed to board unless and
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Reseating is likely not an option these days.  Most of the flights are
> full.

Full flight or not.  If a person smells bad enough that I can't stand
it, I'll make enough noise that something will be done.  If they choose
to eject me, thats all right too.
wester@laway.net - 14 May 2006 01:11 GMT
>The global carriers need to enact a rule that people who arrive at a flight
>with unacceptable personal hygiene will not be allowed to board unless and
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Cant something be done??

Oi, veh. Yeah, just what we need. More rules. I can see Shrub
tomorrow:

"We will no longer tolerate BO."

Get a life, already.
Maxx - 14 May 2006 01:35 GMT
> >The global carriers need to enact a rule that people who arrive at a flight
> >with unacceptable personal hygiene will not be allowed to board unless and
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Oi, veh. Yeah, just what we need. More rules. I can see Shrub
> tomorrow:

> "We will no longer tolerate BO."
>
> Get a life, already.

Aparently, you have never been on a crowded flight with a serious stink
weed.  It's not pleasant to sit for hours wondering when you'll lose
it, and toss your lunch.
mrtravel - 14 May 2006 04:23 GMT
>>>The global carriers need to enact a rule that people who arrive at a flight
>>>with unacceptable personal hygiene will not be allowed to board unless and
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> weed.  It's not pleasant to sit for hours wondering when you'll lose
> it, and toss your lunch.

If it bothers you that much, take another flight
If it is bothering others and they complain, the offending person will
be removed. If it only bothers you, then maybe you're the problem
HLS@nospam.nix - 14 May 2006 13:02 GMT
"mrtravel" <mrtravel@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:qox9g.86570
> If it bothers you that much, take another flight
> If it is bothering others and they complain, the offending person will
> be removed. If it only bothers you, then maybe you're the problem

In this case, it was bothering a LOT of us.  We were exposed to this group
of stinkers after going through the security checkin in AMS.  People moved
away from the 'group', tears came to eyes, etc, but the flight was boarding
and
nobody wanted to make a scene.

I was lucky.  I didn't have to sit near them.

But in the past, I HAVE been forced to sit amongst this sort of carrion.
These
flights are usually FULL and there is no chance to change your seating
arrangements.

When people make statements like 'get a life', it shows just how stupid they
are.
mrtravel - 15 May 2006 03:12 GMT
> "mrtravel" <mrtravel@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:qox9g.86570
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> and
> nobody wanted to make a scene.

See, then you have only yourselves to blame.
What scene are you referring to. You simply go up to gate agent or FA
and tell them, and have the other people do the same.
Anonyma - 17 May 2006 01:40 GMT
Fired Cisco troll/netkook/pedophile/a.shole Michael Voight "mrtravel" kooked:

>>>>The global carriers need to enact a rule that people who arrive at a flight
>>>>with unacceptable personal hygiene will not be allowed to board unless and
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>If it is bothering others and they complain, the offending person will
>be removed. If it only bothers you, then maybe you're the problem

Says the biggest psycho in the history of usenet..........

@@@@@@@@@@@

Usenet Public Message

The "mrtravel" psycho:

- suffers from Narcissistic Personality Disorder
- is a 47 year old unemployed loser, alcoholic, drug addict/dealer
- has been trolling usenet and flooding newsgroups for TWO DECADES
- has been harassing and stalking usenet posters for TWO DECADES
- is a known criminal, in trouble with the law since he was a teenager
- has no life outside usenet, is online trolling/harassing/stalking 24/7
- is such a loser he often responds to posts within one or two minutes
- is a known liar and bullshitter, lies about everything
- was fired by Cisco in early 2005 for doing all of the above from work
- likes to make death threats
- is a known pedophile and child sexual predator
- is a known importer of Russian whores looking for fast cheap green cards

If you are one of his victims, report him to Scotts Valley police:

Michael D. Voight, aka "mrtravel"
111 Bean Creek Rd, No. 118
Scotts Valley,  CA  95066-4148
(831) 438-2485

Scotts Valley PD
One Civic Center Drive
Scotts Valley, CA 95066
(831) 440-5670

Police Chief Steve Lind
s l i n d @ s c o t t s v a l l e y . o r g

http://www.scottsvalleypd.com

Also contact the Scotts Valley mayor:

Paul Marigonda
m a r i g o n d @ p a c b e l l . n e t

About the "mrtravel" psycho - FAQ
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.travel.cruises/msg/f207022ace08c90c

More info on the psycho
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.travel.cruises/msg/25a7ed8ad9d9d920

mrtravel's drug abuse
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/ba.general/msg/f0c64751c93c3e2c

mrtravel's wife left him
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.travel.air/msg/6828ed1eb3843662
Gregory Morrow - 18 May 2006 22:18 GMT
> Fired Cisco troll/netkook/pedophile/a.shole Michael Voight "mrtravel" kooked:
>
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
> mrtravel's wife left him
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.travel.air/msg/6828ed1eb3843662

Bump...

Signature

Best
Greg

-L. - 14 May 2006 08:17 GMT
> The global carriers need to enact a rule that people who arrive at a flight
> with unacceptable personal hygiene will not be allowed to board unless and
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Cant something be done??

The worse are the belchers and the farters.  For f.ck's sake, go to the
lav if you need to do that!

-L.
Maxx - 14 May 2006 17:10 GMT
> > The global carriers need to enact a rule that people who arrive at a flight
> > with unacceptable personal hygiene will not be allowed to board unless and
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> The worse are the belchers and the farters.  For f.ck's sake, go to the
> lav if you need to do that!

Sadly enough, no one will get up to go to the lav if they can squeeze
one off in the seat.  That's where the air nozzles come in handy.  A
gentle breeze blowing down the front of your face is a pleasant releif.

The thing that bothers me is peanut breath.
HLS@nospam.nix - 15 May 2006 00:13 GMT
> Sadly enough, no one will get up to go to the lav if they can squeeze
> one off in the seat.  That's where the air nozzles come in handy.  A
> gentle breeze blowing down the front of your face is a pleasant releif.
>
> The thing that bothers me is peanut breath.

A fart would smell better than these characters.

I started using surgical masks a few years ago when SARS was an issue.
Found it really stopped 'travelers colds', so I still wear them.  I guess
they
would not filter out the stench, but the N95's are supposed to offer some
protection from avian flu.
Charles J. van Doornewaard - 27 May 2006 10:27 GMT
I remember last year when I flew back from San Francisco to Keflavik Iceland on an Icelandair flight. Some American
young man came to sit next to me with an odour that was more dead than alive.

And the flight was going to last for about 7,5 hours so I thought that I was in for "a real treat" here. But then I
opened up more the air switch on panel above your seat, underneaththe overhead lockers, and to my amazement the smell
soon disappeared and I had no more bother with it. The problem was soon solved well before take-off.

So that could be an option too.

>The global carriers need to enact a rule that people who arrive at a flight
>with unacceptable personal hygiene will not be allowed to board unless and
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Cant something be done??
rkbose@gmail.com - 30 May 2006 08:31 GMT
> And the flight was going to last for about 7,5 hours so I thought that I was in for "a real treat" here. But then I
> opened up more the air switch on panel above your seat, underneaththe overhead lockers, and to my amazement the smell
> soon disappeared and I had no more bother with it. The problem was soon solved well before take-off.
>
> So that could be an option too.

I boarded a plane once that smelled as though the carpet had been
shampooed with urine. The flight hung around the runway for over an
hour, waiting for clearance to take off, and it was a warm day.
Surprisingly, as soon as they started the engines and turned on the
aircon, the smell pretty much disappeared.

Rupa Bose
www.rupabose.org
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.