hey guys. Thank you for China's environmental concerns. i am learning
environment science in china. Pollution is a very serious here. but we
are trying .
> So it's 100% local technology??
Chinese-German technology.
> I hope it helps their environment!
Depends on how the electricity is produced, if they do as Denmark and burn
coal/oil, then it's not good for the environment.
//Aho
jay - 05 May 2006 04:52 GMT
hi J.O. Aho
u are right. here we produced electricity by coal and most of
Atmospheric pollution
is course by it.
We have recognized this. but we can't stop. if we change, it need alot
of money
and many factories will stop work.
Pollution is very serious in China, but we are very backward technology
and equipment, we can not very good.
maybe some German company can come to china and i'm sure it can own a
lot of money.
by the way,the France's company has come but they may not do well and
even have no
web site
J.O. Aho - 05 May 2006 05:20 GMT
> hi J.O. Aho
> u are right. here we produced electricity by coal and most of
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> maybe some German company can come to china and i'm sure it can own a
> lot of money.
Germany is cutting down on nuclear and is beginning to use more oil/coal, so
thats so good.
IMHO Finland's new nuclear plant is the way to go, think China could benefit
of this too.
//Aho
Hans-Joachim Zierke - 06 May 2006 02:49 GMT
J.O. Aho schrieb:
> Germany is cutting down on nuclear
Yes.
> and is beginning to use more oil/coal,
No. Power generation out of oil is almost non-existing , and there
aren't any plans to build oil power stations. As well, I'm not aware of
any increase in coal consumption for power generation, though the amount
of power generated out of it may indeed be higher than 10 years ago.
Expected is an increase in the consumption of natural gas, mostly from
Russian sources.
Growth in wind energy:
Installed power 2004: 16629 MW
Installed power 2005: 18428 MW
Delivered power in 2005: 26.5 TWh, which is 5.5% of consumption.
Official goals for wind energy are:
4.2% of primary energy by 2010
10% of primary energy by 2020
50% of primary energy by 2050
Hans-Joachim
> So it's 100% local technology??
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/05/01/china.maglev.ap/index.html
It's mostly German. The Siemens/Thyssen-Krupp people put up
a nice web site about it.
http://www.transrapid.com/
> I hope it helps their environment!
Supposedly, the air-conditioning equipment uses more juice than
what's used to support the train. Sounds pretty efficent
to me!

Signature
Ned Carlson
SW side of Chicago, USA
www.tubezone.net
Bob Myers - 02 May 2006 20:37 GMT
> > So it's 100% local technology??
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://www.transrapid.com/
You're confusing two different maglevs. The original posting was
about a Chinese experimental system built near Chengdu; the
Transrapid maglev is the one which has been in service for some
time in the Pudong area of Shanghai.
Bob M.
Ned Carlson - 04 May 2006 08:08 GMT
>>>http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/05/01/china.maglev.ap/index.html
> You're confusing two different maglevs. The original posting was
> about a Chinese experimental system built near Chengdu; the
> Transrapid maglev is the one which has been in service for some
> time in the Pudong area of Shanghai.
>
> Bob M.
D'oh, sorry! The picture on the CNN page shows
a picture of the Shanghai train.

Signature
Ned Carlson
SW side of Chicago, USA
www.tubezone.net
Hans-Joachim Zierke - 03 May 2006 11:35 GMT
Ned Carlson schrieb:
> Supposedly, the air-conditioning equipment uses more juice than
> what's used to support the train. Sounds pretty efficent
> to me!
The Transrapid uses 1.7 kW / metric ton for lifting and guidance.
Hans-Joachim
NYC XYZ
> So it's 100% local technology??
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/05/01/china.maglev.ap/index.html
>
> I hope it helps their environment!
I hope their farmers gets to ride it for free.
BillReese - 29 Jul 2006 02:15 GMT
>>> So it's 100% local technology??=
>>> http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/05/01/china.maglev.ap/index.html
>>> I hope it helps their environment!
>I hope their farmers gets to ride it for free.
This thing is Shanghai which, if I am not mistaken, is China's third most
populace city after Chongqing and Beijing.. Why would farmers want a free
ride between the airport and the outskirts of Puddong???
( BTW... a ride is inexpensive, it would cost more to go the same
distance in their very cheap cabs)
I've been on the MagLev, it's very kool technology.. And a very nice
looking monorail station.. everything about this train is quite modern...
But when you ride it you don't feel like you are going as fast as the
screens say you are.. I take their word for it that it actually does go
that fast. One thing is certain, the train is really a smooth ride. Hat's
off to the leadership in China for this.. Even though the service is not
very useful, the proof of technology is a very good thing for them to have
done.
BR (the Reese'Mister)