Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Destinations
USA and CanadaEuropeAustralia and NZAsiaLatin AmericaCaribbean IslandsAfrica
Travel Types
Air TravelCruisesRV Travel

Travel Forum / Travel Types / Cruises / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is on-board food really that bad

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
bringyagrogalong - 23 Jul 2008 05:23 GMT
If food, which is included in the fare, is of good quality and
variety, why do they also have restaurants on board where you can eat
at an additional cost?

Is the food really that bad that you would willingly pay to eat
anywhere else?
Bill - 23 Jul 2008 07:42 GMT
> If food, which is included in the fare, is of good quality and
> variety, why do they also have restaurants on board where you can eat
> at an additional cost?
>
> Is the food really that bad that you would willingly pay to eat
> anywhere else?

The simple answer is that the specialty restaurants have a
somewhat higher quality of food and/or preparation that some
people are willing to pay for. And it's not a matter of that the
dining room food is "bad" (except for NCL, IMHO), it's just that
the specialty restaurants are better, or at least different.
Some folks are happy to in the dining room for their entire
cruise and don't feel the need for anything else. Some people
would probably even be happy to eat at the pool grill. It's all
personal taste. Think of it as eating at Applebee's vs. eating
at a higher end restaurant when you're at home.
Boomer - 23 Jul 2008 11:28 GMT
>> If food, which is included in the fare, is of good quality and
>> variety, why do they also have restaurants on board where you can eat
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> personal taste. Think of it as eating at Applebee's vs. eating
> at a higher end restaurant when you're at home.

That' so true. We have never opted to eat at any "specialty" restaurant &
have never regretted it. The food in the regular dr's is fine with us. If we
were at home & ate out it the "regular" food would suffice so why spend the
extra money for something a little bit better? I look at it as though I've
already paid for a good meal & now have to pay again & for us it doesn't
justify the extra quality. On the other hand my brother-in-law was on a
cruise & never ate in the regular dr once, opting for special meals every
night & thought it was great.
George Leppla - 23 Jul 2008 12:58 GMT
> That' so true. We have never opted to eat at any "specialty" restaurant &
> have never regretted it. The food in the regular dr's is fine with us.

For trhe most part, I agree.  On most cruise lines, the food in the dining
rooms and buffets is pretty good, or as good as it can get when you are
trying to prepare and serve 3000 meals in 4 hours.

> If we were at home & ate out it the "regular" food would suffice so why
> spend the extra money for something a little bit better?

Special occasion... or just maybe "putting on the Ritz" and doing something
that you don't normally do.  Sometimes, it is just fun!  Sometimes it can be
the difference between just getting something to eat compared to a nice
dining experience.

I agree that I don't like the model where the majority of "restaurants" on a
ship have additional costs, but cruise lines like Carnival, Princess and
Royal Caribbean may give you one or two specialty restaurants  and still
maintain good quality in the dining rooms.

Signature

George Leppla    http://www.CruiseMaster.com

October 26, 2008 Sleazy 5  http://www.cruisemaster.com/sleazy5.htm
Feb. 8, 2009 Solstice Valentine http://www.cruisemaster.com/solstice.htm
May 10, 2009  ALASKA  http://www.cruisemaster.com/moagc4.htm

Kurt Ullman - 23 Jul 2008 13:08 GMT
> I agree that I don't like the model where the majority of "restaurants" on a
> ship have additional costs, but cruise lines like Carnival, Princess and
> Royal Caribbean may give you one or two specialty restaurants  and still
> maintain good quality in the dining rooms.

  Also some of the specialty areas are more fun. For instance the
Johnny Rockets on the bigger RCCL ships.
Brian K - 28 Jul 2008 02:45 GMT
On 7/23/2008 8:08 AM  Kurt Ullman plucked Senior Frog's Magic Twanger
and said:

>  
>> I agree that I don't like the model where the majority of "restaurants" on a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Johnny Rockets on the bigger RCCL ships.
>  
Fun? Well maybe. But if I want to eat at a Johnny Rockets I can at the
local shopping mall and probably at half the price!

Signature

________
To  email me, Edit "blog" from my email address.
 Brian M. Kochera  
"Some mistakes are too much fun to only make once!"
View My Web Page: http://home.earthlink.net/~brian1951

Kurt Ullman - 28 Jul 2008 11:55 GMT
> Fun? Well maybe. But if I want to eat at a Johnny Rockets I can at the
> local shopping mall and probably at half the price!

 But RCCL gives free admission to the JR for even the lowest levels of
C&A membership. (Probably makes it even MORE fun, if you think about it.)
Boomer - 28 Jul 2008 14:46 GMT
>> Fun? Well maybe. But if I want to eat at a Johnny Rockets I can at the
>> local shopping mall and probably at half the price!
>
>  But RCCL gives free admission to the JR for even the lowest levels of
> C&A membership. (Probably makes it even MORE fun, if you think about it.)

I haven't been on RCCl since they started charging for JR. Are you saying
they've discontinued charging?
Kurt Ullman - 28 Jul 2008 15:19 GMT
> >> Fun? Well maybe. But if I want to eat at a Johnny Rockets I can at the
> >> local shopping mall and probably at half the price!
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I haven't been on RCCl since they started charging for JR. Are you saying
> they've discontinued charging?

 The Crown and Anchor book that you get after the first trip (we are
still amongst the lowest of the low) has a coupon for free "admission"
to JR. Just like it has $5.00 free interenet access, 2 for 1 drinks,
etc.
Nonnymus - 23 Jul 2008 18:14 GMT
 Think of it as eating at Applebee's vs. eating
> at a higher end restaurant when you're at home.

Er. . . we "top out" at Applebee's when it comes to find dining with the
Nonnys.  Are you saying that there can be something better?

Signature

Nonny

Nonnymus
I'm not who you think I am.  I'm not who
I think I am.  I am what I think you think I am.

Dillon Pyron - 24 Jul 2008 22:57 GMT
[Default] Thus spake Bill <billrubin@prodigy.net>:

>> If food, which is included in the fare, is of good quality and
>> variety, why do they also have restaurants on board where you can eat
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>personal taste. Think of it as eating at Applebee's vs. eating
>at a higher end restaurant when you're at home.

We have only had one complaint in food.  Our first cruise was a
Carnival 5 day on the Celebration.  After the 3rd night, the lettuce
left something to be desired.  Since then, it seems that most of the
lines have been taking on short term perishables at various ports.

And on something like a 14 day East West PC cruise, you can't stuff
enough food into the freezers and fridges.
number6 - 23 Jul 2008 12:49 GMT
> If food, which is included in the fare, is of good quality and
> variety, why do they also have restaurants on board where you can eat
> at an additional cost?
>
> Is the food really that bad that you would willingly pay to eat
> anywhere else?

Regular dining is fine ... The specialty restauants are extras mainly
for the ambience ... calmer quieter more intimate ... although also
the cuts of meat ... the size of the shrimp ... the choice of
desserts ... are somewhat better ... but nothing about regular dining
is bad ...
nekochan - 23 Jul 2008 13:01 GMT
Food is, of course, a really subjective area. Some people love Brussel
Sprouts or liver - I find them revolting. The food on most ships in
most dining rooms is decent - some cruiselines have better food than
others, but again, it's a subjective taste. The specialty restaurants,
however, give you a choice to have a change of venue for dining, not
to mention a special food. For instance, NCL's french restaurant has a
chocolate fondue that is really amazing.

Dining room has always been fine for me, although I usually end up in
the buffet because I don't like to spend huge amounts of time on meals
on my trips. I've also discovered that the buffet usually has the same
food (at least on NCL) as the main dining room, so I feel I'd rather
spend the time enjoying a mai tai in a quiet corner listening to the
ocean than sitting and waiting for the food to be served. Not going to
the dining room for most meals has the added benefit of gaining little
or no weight on a cruise.
Kurt Ullman - 23 Jul 2008 13:06 GMT
In article
<41fba54a-197b-4f88-884d-f9886906fe75@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,

> > If food, which is included in the fare, is of good quality and
> > variety, why do they also have restaurants on board where you can eat
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> desserts ... are somewhat better ... but nothing about regular dining
> is bad ...

  Kay & I eat at least once in the specialties. After awhile the main
dining becomes "home" and we like to go "out" once a week. We like the
change of environment, pace, etc.
number6 - 23 Jul 2008 14:57 GMT
> In article
> <41fba54a-197b-4f88-884d-f9886906f...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> dining becomes "home" and we like to go "out" once a week. We like the
> change of environment, pace, etc.

Exactly as we look at it ... On our transatlantic/Iberian peninsula
cruise earlier this year ... 3 specialty restaurant meals blended
nicely with the 13 day cruise ... and 7 sea days overall ...
HikeBandit - 23 Jul 2008 17:22 GMT
> > In article
> > <41fba54a-197b-4f88-884d-f9886906f...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> cruise earlier this year ... 3 specialty restaurant meals blended
> nicely with the 13 day cruise ... and 7 sea days overall ...

I just can't imagine having three restaurants. Why not go on a small
cruise boat where the food is gourmet and made to your order every
day? It's like having your own personal chef for the duration.

--Margery
Quasar Expeditions
http://www.galapagosexpeditions.com
Jack Hamilton - 24 Jul 2008 05:36 GMT
>> > In article
>> > <41fba54a-197b-4f88-884d-f9886906f...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>cruise boat where the food is gourmet and made to your order every
>day? It's like having your own personal chef for the duration.

The perception is that it's too expensive.

Your company's cruises, for example, sound very interesting, and I'd
love to go on one, but a week on one of your ships would cost two or
three times what I would pay for a week on Princess or NCL (though not
to the Galapagos).

You might, by the way, want to update your web pages to show 2009
cruises instead of 2007 cruises.

>--Margery
> Quasar Expeditions
> http://www.galapagosexpeditions.com
Becca - 24 Jul 2008 18:39 GMT
> I just can't imagine having three restaurants. Why not go on a small
> cruise boat where the food is gourmet and made to your order every
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>  Quasar Expeditions
>  http://www.galapagosexpeditions.com

It depends on why you enjoy cruising.  I like the ships and I enjoy
being at sea. The entertainment onboard is one of the highlights for me,
not so much the food.

Becca
Surfer E2468 - 23 Jul 2008 22:49 GMT
We never eat in the specialty restaurants,since we are not big eaters,we
are quite content with the food offered in the main dining room,or at
the buffet. And do not think the cruise lines should charge for dining
in another room.

                                                                                                      <
cruise lover>
J Carnaghie - 25 Jul 2008 17:19 GMT
> We never eat in the specialty restaurants,since we are not big eaters,we
> are quite content with the food offered in the main dining room,or at
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> cruise lover>
>  

I agree that the food offered in the special
venues is a lot better than the food offered in
the general dining rooms, The service is also a
significant "cut above" the service in the general
dining rooms. If the food is better and the
service is more "intense" an additional charge is
worthwhile.
Just how much the additional charge amounts to is
another matter. I believe that the price point is
set to ensure that the extra charge dining room
returns the highest potential profit, not a
reflection of what it costs the line to provide.
Cheers,
   John in LALALand (Where everything is extra!)
Tom K - 23 Jul 2008 13:16 GMT
> If food, which is included in the fare, is of good quality and
> variety, why do they also have restaurants on board where you can eat
> at an additional cost?
>
> Is the food really that bad that you would willingly pay to eat
> anywhere else?

As others have said, it's very much about presentation.  You might even use
the term entertainment.

Sometimes you'll get something very unique in a specialty restaurant.  Or
something so memorable, that you'll always remember it.  The goat cheese
soufflé in the Celebrity specialty restaurants is in that category - simply
outstanding.  I've even made it at home a number of times (the recipe was in
the Celebrity magazine).  And even better was the mandarin orange crème
brule in Todd English on the Queen Mary 2.  That's the best dessert I've
ever had.  Period.  Case closed.

Another interesting (and free) specialty restaurant on the Queen Mary 2 was
the one called Chef's Galley, which is basically an "Emeril Live" at sea.
You get to eat the exact same meal that the chef prepares (though chefs
behind the demonstration area prepare the larger quantities required to feed
the 6 tables of guests).
LVTravel - 23 Jul 2008 22:00 GMT
IMHO, the specialty restaurant food is what you got in the main dining room
10-15 years ago.  All the lines have made their main dining menus less
appetizing and the specialty restaurants are to bring in more money for the
cruise lines.  Again, JMHO but I really think accurate after cruising
regularly for the last 30 years.

> If food, which is included in the fare, is of good quality and
> variety, why do they also have restaurants on board where you can eat
> at an additional cost?
>
> Is the food really that bad that you would willingly pay to eat
> anywhere else?
bringyagrogalong - 26 Jul 2008 07:08 GMT
> IMHO, the specialty restaurant food is what you got in the main dining room
> 10-15 years ago.  All the lines have made their main dining menus less
> appetizing and the specialty restaurants are to bring in more money for the
> cruise lines.  Again, JMHO but I really think accurate after cruising
> regularly for the last 30 years.

Well said!

> > If food, which is included in the fare, is of good quality and
> > variety, why do they also have restaurants on board where you can eat
> > at an additional cost?
>
> > Is the food really that bad that you would willingly pay to eat
> > anywhere else?
Dory Samuels - 26 Jul 2008 13:06 GMT
The joke is the specialty dining on the Constellation last April.  The
dining room was beautiful but so was the regular dining room.  The food
was about same in each.  The service was very odd to say the least.  We
were told the menu was a 2 part choice.  The left side had 3 or 4
courses and no wine.......but for just a "little" more money the right
side had 1 or 2 additional courses and  wine throughout the dinner,
changing with each course.  The problem was our party of 4 were
instructed we had to ALL order from the same side of the menu.  This was
?  can't find the right word.  We opted for the left side since only 2
drank wine.  Bread was served on your individual bread plate with the
1st course.  When dishes were picked up after the 1st course the bread
plates were also removed.......except one lady at the table told the
waiter she wasn't finished with hers.  He looked confused and seemed
reluctant when he walked away.
The bread plate became a joke/issue during the dinner when the waiter
repeatedly tried to remove it.  At one point he managed to do this while
we were deep in conversation.  However our lady friend insisted he bring
a new plate and more bread.  It had become a "sore point" with her.  At
over $30.00 each for dinner we all thought she should have her bread
plate at her place as long as she wanted it.  The rest of the meal was
comical.  4 waiters brought the main course  to our table and (after a
silent nod) in unison removed the large silver domes.  This was
performed like a ballet.

We were finally able to thaw out all our servers and had a good laugh
with them about the entire production.  After all it wasn't their fault
that Celebrity (who we love) had concocted this ? idea.

Compare this to the specialty dinning on the Miracle.  That experience
was delightful.  Service was superb and the food even better than the
Constellation.
 
If we did another specialty dinner it would be for the quiet and elegant
ambiance.

~~DORY~~
  ________ / /___/ /___/ /_________
 \::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::/
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
    
Jack Hamilton - 26 Jul 2008 19:06 GMT
>The joke is the specialty dining on the Constellation last April.  The
>dining room was beautiful but so was the regular dining room.  The food
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>?  can't find the right word.  We opted for the left side since only 2
>drank wine.

They do that because the number of courses served varies, and they
don't want to have half of the table being served food while the other
half sits there with an empty plate.

Why they think it's not up to the guests to decide whether that's ok?
I don't know.

In Le Bistro (on NCL), I was able to mix and match between the two
sides - that is, I could get items from the expensive side served as
replacements for items on the less expensive side.  That eliminated
the problem described above.

I don't remember whether I tried that on Celebrity or not.  I think I
switched the soup or the salad, not one of the main dishes.  Whether
you can do it probably depends on the mood of the waiter, head-waiter,
and chef, how busy the restaurant is, whether they're running low on
anything, the phase of the moon, etc.

>Bread was served on your individual bread plate with the
>1st course.  When dishes were picked up after the 1st course the bread
>plates were also removed.......except one lady at the table told the
>waiter she wasn't finished with hers.  He looked confused and seemed
>reluctant when he walked away.

>The bread plate became a joke/issue during the dinner when the waiter
>repeatedly tried to remove it.  At one point he managed to do this while
>we were deep in conversation.  However our lady friend insisted he bring
>a new plate and more bread.  It had become a "sore point" with her.  At
>over $30.00 each for dinner we all thought she should have her bread
>plate at her place as long as she wanted it.  

Their attitude seems silly at best.  I have the same problem when I
want the bread to stay on the table through dessert.

>The rest of the meal was
>comical.  4 waiters brought the main course  to our table and (after a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>with them about the entire production.  After all it wasn't their fault
>that Celebrity (who we love) had concocted this ? idea.

Celebrity didn't concoct it.  It's an old tradition.  

>Compare this to the specialty dinning on the Miracle.  That experience
>was delightful.  Service was superb and the food even better than the
>Constellation.
>  
>If we did another specialty dinner it would be for the quiet and elegant
>ambiance.

I don't think I would say that the specialty restaurant ambience was
more elegant on either Celebrity or NCL, just quieter and darker.
Ray Goldenberg - 26 Jul 2008 22:48 GMT
> Bread was served on your individual bread plate with the
>1st course.  When dishes were picked up after the 1st course the bread
>plates were also removed..

Hi Dory,

The bread is served in this manner in many European restaurants.

> The rest of the meal was
>comical.  4 waiters brought the main course  to our table and (after a
>silent nod) in unison removed the large silver domes.  This was
>performed like a ballet.

This is done in upscale European restaurants.  

Best regards,
Ray
LIGHTHOUSE TRAVEL
800-719-9917 or 805-566-3905
http://www.lighthousetravel.com
--
Nonnymus - 26 Jul 2008 23:19 GMT
>> The rest of the meal was
>> comical.  4 waiters brought the main course  to our table and (after a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Best regards,
> Ray

When we've had dinner at Emeril's Fish House in MGM Grand here in Las
Vegas, the dinner is served in a similar fashion. There's one server per
diner, and the entree is presented to the diners at a table
simultaneously.  Even with all the servers, they still get miffed when
you request catsup for the lobster, though.

Signature

Nonny

Nonnymus
I'm not who you think I am.  I'm not who
I think I am.  I am what I think you think I am.

Jack Hamilton - 27 Jul 2008 19:49 GMT
>>> The rest of the meal was
>>> comical.  4 waiters brought the main course  to our table and (after a
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>simultaneously.  Even with all the servers, they still get miffed when
>you request catsup for the lobster, though.

You just need to ask for the "sauce aux tomates".
Dory Samuels - 27 Jul 2008 12:41 GMT
Thank you Ray.  Now we understand.  Since we were aboard a ship and not
in a European country it never occurred to us this might be the custom.
Live & learn.  <big smile>

~~DORY~~
  ________ / /___/ /___/ /_________
 \::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::/
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
    
LeeNY - 30 Jul 2008 15:00 GMT
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:06:24 -0400, dorysamu...@webtv.net (Dory

> > The rest of the meal was
> >comical.  4 waiters brought the main course  to our table and (after a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Best regards,
> Ray

With all due respect Ray, the service in a fine restaurant should be
invisible. The focus should be on the food, not on the waitstaff
serving it. Fine service means your needs should be anticipated; for
instance, the correct silverware for the course being served next
should be there in front of you. And, this service should be provided
almost invisibly, so there's no break in the flow of the meal. Never
should the waitstaff draw such attention to themselves that they
disrupt the conversation of the diners (except for taking orders). In
my opinion, the "ballet" of removing the silver domes is tacky. Again,
it should be the food that's the star, not the folks serving it.
Ray Goldenberg - 30 Jul 2008 15:27 GMT
>With all due respect Ray, the service in a fine restaurant should be
>invisible.

Hi Lee,

Thanks for the respect. <:+)
I stated what happens at the restaurants to explain why they do this
on ships.  They did not ask my opinion nor yours and will no doubt
continue this service whether we like it or not.

Best regards,
Ray
LIGHTHOUSE TRAVEL
800-719-9917 or 805-566-3905
http://www.lighthousetravel.com
--
Nonnymus - 30 Jul 2008 15:35 GMT
>> With all due respect Ray, the service in a fine restaurant should be
>> invisible.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> on ships.  They did not ask my opinion nor yours and will no doubt
> continue this service whether we like it or not.

I guess we differ.  I feel a fine restaurant should offer diversion to
go along with the food.  For me, it's still Chuck Cheese when I want the
very best.

Nonny

Nonnymus
I'm not who you think I am.  I'm not who
I think I am.  I am what I think you think I am.
Kurt Ullman - 30 Jul 2008 15:42 GMT
> I guess we differ.  I feel a fine restaurant should offer diversion to
> go along with the food.  For me, it's still Chuck Cheese when I want the
> very best.

   If you want diversion, you can't beat Hooters.
Ray Goldenberg - 30 Jul 2008 15:44 GMT
>For me, it's still Chuck Cheese when I want the
>very best.

Hi Nonny,

Ah yes, enjoying the Skytubes® attraction along with a Super Combo and
free refills on soft drinks.  What more could we ask for? <:+)
Been there, done that with the world's cutest granddaughter.

Best regards,
Ray
LIGHTHOUSE TRAVEL
800-719-9917 or 805-566-3905
http://www.lighthousetravel.com
--
Kurt Ullman - 30 Jul 2008 15:50 GMT
> Ah yes, enjoying the Skytubes® attraction along with a Super Combo and
> free refills on soft drinks.  What more could we ask for? <:+)
> Been there, done that with the world's cutest granddaughter.
>
>  
  The other good thing about eating a pizza at CEC (at least when my
kids used to go there 20 years or so ago) is the warm feeling you get
from patronizing what has to be the country's largest recycler of
cardboard. (g)_.
Nonnymus - 30 Jul 2008 17:52 GMT
>> For me, it's still Chuck Cheese when I want the
>> very best.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> free refills on soft drinks.  What more could we ask for? <:+)
> Been there, done that with the world's cutest granddaughter.

Ray, when our kids were little, we visited ChuckECheese precisely 2
times before both the kids and we tired of it.  Now, however, I take
great enjoyment of listening to our son and his wife describe their
visits to it with their own children.  Our granddaughers absolutely love
the place, however, and since one of the birthdays almost coincides with
an anniversary, the kids now celebrate both at ChuckECheese. <grin>

Nonny

Nonnymus
I'm not who you think I am.  I'm not who
I think I am.  I am what I think you think I am.
BobEdwards - 31 Jul 2008 17:47 GMT
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:06:24 -0400, dorysamu...@webtv.net (Dory
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> 800-719-9917 or 805-566-3905http://www.lighthousetravel.com
> --

I agree with Ray (doesn't that make you feel more secure Ray? :) ).
The silver dome thing is an European thing.  I've seen it in several
of the finest restaurants in Paris.

I've always been uncertain about tipping in ships' alternative
restaurants.  Is service included in the price of the restaurant?
Ray Goldenberg - 31 Jul 2008 18:07 GMT
>I agree with Ray (doesn't that make you feel more secure Ray? :) ).
>The silver dome thing is an European thing.  I've seen it in several
>of the finest restaurants in Paris.
>
>I've always been uncertain about tipping in ships' alternative
>restaurants.  Is service included in the price of the restaurant?

Hi Bob,

Thanks for the verification that I am not completely crazy (only
partially). <:+)
As far as tipping in the specialty restaurants, it really varies by
cruise line so there is not one correct answer.

Best regards,
Ray
LIGHTHOUSE TRAVEL
800-719-9917 or 805-566-3905
http://www.lighthousetravel.com
--
jessica_smith_nyc - 24 Jul 2008 05:04 GMT
Sometimes you feel like getting some food not on the regular menu like
lobster or filet mignon.......

---
http://www.moviesitearchive.com/travel

> If food, which is included in the fare, is of good quality and
> variety, why do they also have restaurants on board where you can eat
> at an additional cost?
>
> Is the food really that bad that you would willingly pay to eat
> anywhere else?
GadgetWorld@webtv.net - 24 Jul 2008 14:17 GMT
On board food is whatever you want it to be.

Optional extra cost restaurants were so greatly rejected  initially that
NCL dropped their charge for Le Bistro, but soon brought back the charge
and it has become a staple.

HAL gave a free dinner in an optional restaurant to their high-level
Mariners Club members, once a cruise, but I think that this has bit the
dust.

Optional restaurants do give a nice venue to celebrate special occasions
for long dinners and an opportunity to "show-off" for those who cruise
for that purpose.

Ferry ships in Europe offer everything a la carte including the show,
the cabin, and food choices from gourmet to fast food.

Easy Cruise does al la carte cruising in the med and caribbean, but I
don't think that this is what Americans want in cruising and Europeans
prefer all inclusive
pricing including tips and wine and beer.
 
Inspector Gadget
Jack Hamilton - 24 Jul 2008 06:17 GMT
>HAL gave a free dinner in an optional restaurant to their high-level
>Mariners Club members, once a cruise, but I think that this has bit the
>dust.

NCL claims to give a free dinner in Le Bistro to Platinum Latitudes
members (14 or more cruises).

Given NCL's general administrative incompetence, I suspect that
sometimes that benefit gets lost.
Jr. - 28 Jul 2008 15:08 GMT
Generally when we cruise we like to have a "special" night out to celebrate
our wedding anniversary.

We ususlly go to the steak and lobster restaurant and treat ourselves to the
full bill-of-faire and pass on the regular dining room.

This does not mean that the regular dining room does not have good food. The
other pay-as-you-go restaurants are just something a little special.
John Sisker - 30 Jul 2008 12:18 GMT
While we will also opt for paying a bit extra for the special dining that is
available on most ship these days, one or two times while on the cruise, we
have not experienced any noticeable downgrading of either the food and/or
service for traditional dining. Even though in reading through these
threads, some obviously feel different, this may have more to do with what
they ordered from the menu to begin with and their attitude.

For example, on one cruise our assigned tablemates (a couple) complained
that the food was rather dry, and ended up ordering something else.
Actually, to me, the problem was not really with the food or service, it is
the fact that they showed up 45 minutes late for dinner. Of course, people
like that will never accept the blame or responsibility for their own
actions, so in this case, it was the kitchens fault. Even so, the staff and
kitchen did come through as best they could consider the now limited time
frame.

Happy sailing...
John Sisker - SHIP-TO-SHORE CRUISE AGENCY (sm)
(714) 536-3850 or toll-free at (800) 724-6644 & (Agency ID: 714.536.3850)
www.shiptoshorecruise.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.