Computer network question
|
|
Thread rating:  |
GBinNC - 26 Aug 2008 20:27 GMT I'm getting a "Windows - System Error. There is an IP address conflict with another system on the network" in a popup message above the tray at the lower right corner of the screen.
What does this mean, and how am I supposed to correct it? The only other computer on the network is my wife's laptop, but I don't believe it's even turned on right now. I'm on a cable at the moment, but my wife's is wireless (mine is too, when I'm closer to the router than out here on the porch).
99.9% of the time the network works perfectly, but once in a while this happens. I'm somewhat of a novice networker, so I usually end up rebooting both computers and the router and starting all over (which usually fixes it), but if there's an easier and quicker way I'd like to know it. I'd also like to know what causes the problem in the first place. We haven't changed anything on our computers or on the network in a long time.
[I hate to reboot -- it takes forever to get everything set up again the way I want it. I typically reboot about once a week, after I make a backup.]
Advice, anybody?
TIA. GB in NC
Tom J - 26 Aug 2008 21:01 GMT > I'm getting a "Windows - System Error. There is an IP address > conflict [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > router > than out here on the porch). Being wireless when you are normally on cable is most likely the conflict. Try setting up 2 accounts, 1 on the cable and 1 wireless. I use to be a computer guru so get a 2nd opinion - make that 3rd!!
Tom J
Flathead - 26 Aug 2008 21:09 GMT >> I'm getting a "Windows - System Error. There is an IP address conflict >> with another system on the network" in a popup message above the tray [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Tom J Thanks for the OT u bemis!! Dmax
GBinNC - 26 Aug 2008 22:21 GMT >Thanks for the OT u bemis!! The last time OT was discussed here it was suggested that computer questions are NOT OT because we all use computers to communicate here.
If I ever post anything that's "really" OT -- which I almost never do -- I will be sure to mark it as such.
GB in NC
GBinNC - 26 Aug 2008 22:22 GMT >Being wireless when you are normally on cable is most likely the >conflict. Try setting up 2 accounts, 1 on the cable and 1 wireless. I >use to be a computer guru so get a 2nd opinion - make that 3rd!! My normal situation, day in and day out, is that I'm on cable and my wife is on wireless. That is the situation now, as well.
GB in NC
Dry Heat - 26 Aug 2008 21:09 GMT > I'm getting a "Windows - System Error. There is an IP address conflict > with another system on the network" in a popup message above the tray [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > TIA. > GB in NC GB,
You might want to check your firewall setting in your router. Sounds like one of your IP addresses might be blocked in your router. The problem is probably caused by a setting in the router. There should be a way to access the router and reset it to the factory defaults if the problem seems to be the router. Many routers use http://192.168.0.1/ to access the setup menu. If you aren't sure on how to do it, try doing a hard reset. Refer to the manual for hard reset.
GBinNC - 26 Aug 2008 22:23 GMT >> Advice, anybody? >> >> GB in NC
>You might want to check your firewall setting in your router. Sounds like >one of your IP addresses might be blocked in your router. The problem is [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >If you aren't sure on how to do it, try doing a hard reset. Refer to the >manual for hard reset. But why would that happen at random, and rarely, when the situation is almost always the same?
GB in NC
Nate - 27 Aug 2008 16:32 GMT >>> Advice, anybody? >>> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > GB in NC Hint: It's not your firewall. Firewalls don't keep track of IP leases. DHCP servers keep track of IP leases and conflicts.
Nate
Robert Bonomi - 26 Aug 2008 21:13 GMT >I'm getting a "Windows - System Error. There is an IP address conflict >with another system on the network" in a popup message above the tray at >the lower right corner of the screen. > >What does this mean, It means that 2 computers on the LAN are trying to use the same IP address. specifically, your machine is seeing 'other' traffic with the address that it thinks of as 'its own' in the 'source' address field.
> and how am I supposed to correct it? It's 'hide and seek' time <wry grin>
First, you have to _find_ the other machine, and then change the IP address associated with _one_ of the conflicting machines.
> The only other >computer on the network is my wife's laptop, but I don't believe it's [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >Advice, anybody? There are _several_ ways of dealing with this matter.
*IF* you always use your computers on your internal 'network' (just you folks and the router), the 'most permanent' thing to do is assign 'fixed' addresses to the machines. that way you "know" they won't conflict with each other.
If you -don't- have fixed addresses for the machines, then when you get a problem, you can go to the 'network connections' panel, click once on the interface you're using to connect with (to select it), then right-click and select 'disable' from the pop-up menu. wait 10-15 seconds, and right- click again, this time select 'enable' from the menu.
This will get you a new address, and you _should_ be back in business.
Rebooting the router _only_ should have similar effect.
There _IS_ another possibility -- that *YOUR* machine is _both_ of the computers involved. <grin>
This can 'theoretically' happen if it connects _both_ by the wireless, AND via the wi-fi, at the same time, to the same router.
There is a setting "somewhere" -- I forget where, and it's not showing up in a casual search -- that disables one of the interfaces (the Ethernet or the wi-fi one) when the other one is in use. In a situation where you might be using a cable _and_ within range of the wi fi from the same router, it is a -really- good idea to get this 'either/or' setting turned on.
*OR*, you can 'manually' disable the Wi-Fi connection on the "network connections" panel, when using the Ethernet cable. You *do* have to remember to re-enable it before the wireless will work elsewhere, though.
GBinNC - 26 Aug 2008 22:31 GMT >>What does this mean,
>It means that 2 computers on the LAN are trying to use the same IP address. >specifically, your machine is seeing 'other' traffic with the address that >it thinks of as 'its own' in the 'source' address field. Well, that much was fairly obvious <g>.
>If you -don't- have fixed addresses for the machines, then when you get a >problem, you can go to the 'network connections' panel, click once on the >interface you're using to connect with (to select it), then right-click >and select 'disable' from the pop-up menu. wait 10-15 seconds, and right- >click again, this time select 'enable' from the menu. Okay, I just tried that. We'll see if it works. (The message doesn't stay there all the time -- just pops up occasionally.) I had already tried "repair" but it said it couldn't renew the IP address.
>There _IS_ another possibility -- that *YOUR* machine is _both_ of the >computers involved. <grin> > >This can 'theoretically' happen if it connects _both_ by the wireless, AND >via the wi-fi, at the same time, to the same router. Nope. Not the problem. The wireless is disabled and has been for some days. However, when they both are connected I still do not get this error.
>There is a setting "somewhere" -- I forget where, and it's not showing >up in a casual search -- that disables one of the interfaces (the Ethernet >or the wi-fi one) when the other one is in use. In a situation where you >might be using a cable _and_ within range of the wi fi from the same router, >it is a -really- good idea to get this 'either/or' setting turned on. As noted above, having both connected (when they were) has not been a problem.
>*OR*, you can 'manually' disable the Wi-Fi connection on the "network >connections" panel, when using the Ethernet cable. You *do* have to >remember to re-enable it before the wireless will work elsewhere, though. I always manually disable the WiFi when I plug in the cable.
It's now been several minutes since I disabled and enabled the LAN, and so far, no message. But that doesn't mean it won't pop up again right after I hit "send" on this message <g>.
GB in NC
Robert Bonomi - 27 Aug 2008 01:13 GMT >>>What does this mean, > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Well, that much was fairly obvious <g>. Yeah, well. :)
"Lets start at the very beginning, a very good place to start." applies. <grin> (Apologies to Julie Andrews, and the Van Trapp family.)
And, unfortunately, that is *ALL* that your computer knows about the situation. "Somebody" is using it's address. it doesn't know who, or especially _where_.
And there is no good way to 'find out', except "see who else complains", and/or physically visit every machine on the LAN and check.
You've got it _relatively_ easy -- I know of one business that had this problem erratically for several _years_. They ended up turning off _every_ other known machine on the LAN, and discovered they _still_ were having a conflict. At this point is was "follow _all_ the wiring" and see where it goes. Eventually they found a cable that went into the wall and _didn't_ come out. It led to a machine that had been (literally!) "walled away" during a remodel. A little Unix-based server box that had been running absolutely unattended, and utterly unbeknownst to anybody, in a space with _no_ access, for more than three years.
I expect it will be _much_ simpler to run down your conflict. *GRIN*
>>If you -don't- have fixed addresses for the machines, then when you get a >>problem, you can go to the 'network connections' panel, click once on the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Okay, I just tried that. We'll see if it works. Note: any of these 'quick fix' things simply ameliorate the problem. They get you "back up and running" fairly quickly, but do not *permanently* solve the underlying problem. To truly _solve_ the problem, one has to find the 'other computer', and make =sure= that it, and your machine will *BOTH* "play nicely" with each other.
> (The message doesn't >stay there all the time -- just pops up occasionally.) Again, the message shows up _only_ when your machine 'hears' traffic from the other machine using 'your' address. If it isn't sending, you won't see the bitch-note.
> I had already >tried "repair" but it said it couldn't renew the IP address. Yup. That's -normal- for the situation, the router thinks the 'other' machine has the lease on that address, and won't hand it out to you again.
That's why you down the interface, and bring it back up again. Your system then thinks it has released the old address, and requests a "new" one, rather than requesting 'renewal' of the one it currently held. That ensures that the router gives you a "new" address.
"Some days you have to out-smart the materials you work with." <grin>
>>There _IS_ another possibility -- that *YOUR* machine is _both_ of the >>computers involved. <grin> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >days. However, when they both are connected I still do not get this >error. Just covering _all_ the possibilities. Without having a snooper on your LAN, I can't tell authoritatively what causes it. <grin>
Anyway, you're doing things *right* in that respect. And that eliminates that possibility from the 'matrix'.
>>There is a setting "somewhere" -- I forget where, and it's not showing >>up in a casual search -- that disables one of the interfaces (the Ethernet [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >As noted above, having both connected (when they were) has not been a >problem. Right. It's not _supposed_ to cause a problem. But sometimes things screw up inside the box, and strange things result. This _is_ MS we're talking about, after all. <wry grin>
>>*OR*, you can 'manually' disable the Wi-Fi connection on the "network >>connections" panel, when using the Ethernet cable. You *do* have to [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >so far, no message. But that doesn't mean it won't pop up again right >after I hit "send" on this message <g>. Yawp. true. If it _does_ however, that =confirms= that there *is* another machine around "somewhere", using the same IP address. If it's not a machine you know about (yours, wife's, etc.), Is it possible that somebody "outside" is piggy-backing on your wireless router (intentionally, or otherwise)? If so, they may have set a fixed address in their machine -- one that just happens to match the one the router assigned to _your_ machine.
GBinNC - 27 Aug 2008 04:15 GMT >Yawp. true. If it _does_ however, that =confirms= that there *is* another >machine around "somewhere", using the same IP address. If it's not a machine >you know about (yours, wife's, etc.), Is it possible that somebody "outside" >is piggy-backing on your wireless router (intentionally, or otherwise)? First, thanks for the long explanation and for the e-mail. I'm learning.
Second, I have no neighbors closer than a half-mile or so, and I'm utterly confident that the nearest ones I do have (1) couldn't tap onto my little WiFi -- which doesn't even reach to my porch except as a "very low" signal, which is why I use a cable when I'm out here; and (2) they almost surely don't have computers anyway.
In a networking situation that has been operating relatively unchanged (and with the same two computers) for longer than a year, this error has popped up maybe half a dozen times at the most, and each time for no discernible reason whatsoever.
Oops. It just occurred to me that we have indeed made one change: several months ago we got a new wireless-capable printer and installed it on the network. (It works fine from either computer.) But I believe -- although I can't remember for sure -- that the error first happened before that.
Next time the error comes up maybe I should turn off the printer and see what happens. Since it's also a fax machine, it's always turned on.
Anyway, the problem seems to have been corrected for now, so I'll quit worrying about it (until next time).
Thanks again, and thanks to all who have offered advice.
GB in NC
Jim Rusling - 27 Aug 2008 04:47 GMT >>Yawp. true. If it _does_ however, that =confirms= that there *is* another >>machine around "somewhere", using the same IP address. If it's not a machine [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > >GB in NC It maybe that when you hibernate your machine the router is reusing the IP address after a while. This would be normal DHCP processing. If it reassigns the IP address to the other machine or the printer then you would get a duplicate IP address when you turned your machine back on. I force the IP address for all my machines by MAC address. If your router has that option I would recommend using it. I also disallow any wireless connection except for those MAC addresses that I specify.
 Signature Jim Rusling More or Less Retired Mustang, OK http://www.rusling.org
GBinNC - 27 Aug 2008 04:50 GMT >It maybe that when you hibernate your machine the router is reusing >the IP address after a while. This would be normal DHCP processing. >If it reassigns the IP address to the other machine or the printer >then you would get a duplicate IP address when you turned your machine >back on. Hmmm.
Thanks. GB in NC
Kevin W. Miller - 26 Aug 2008 21:17 GMT > I'm getting a "Windows - System Error. There is an IP address conflict > with another system on the network" in a popup message above the tray [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > TIA. > GB in NC Open a command prompt and type (without the quotes) "ipconfig /release" and hit "Enter" and then type "ipconfig /renew" and hit "Enter". This should get you a new ip address from whatever device on your network hands them out thereby resolving any potential conflicts
As for your infrequent reboots, I'd recommend you reconsider that position. Windows (which I assume your using) is good at creating temp files as needed but not so good at removing them when no longer needed except when restarting. Always your choice, though.
 Signature Kevin W. Miller http://www.bluemoongemworks.com/rv/index.asp
Kevin W. Miller - 26 Aug 2008 21:21 GMT <snip>
And, this should have been labeled "OT". My mistake.
 Signature Kevin W. Miller "The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference" - Charles Darwin http://www.bluemoongemworks.com/rv/index.asp
GBinNC - 26 Aug 2008 22:36 GMT >Open a command prompt and type (without the quotes) "ipconfig /release" and >hit "Enter" and then type "ipconfig /renew" and hit "Enter". This should get >you a new ip address from whatever device on your network hands them out >thereby resolving any potential conflicts I'll try that next time. I've already disabled and enabled, and the message hasn't shown up yet.
>As for your infrequent reboots, I'd recommend you reconsider that position. >Windows (which I assume your using) is good at creating temp files as needed >but not so good at removing them when no longer needed except when >restarting. Always your choice, though. I have plenty of disk space, so that's not a problem -- and I periodically use Norton 360 to clean up temporary files and other clutter. Rebooting doesn't seem to remove very many of them. Norton usually finds (and removes) several thousand.
I greatly prefer "hibernate," which I use whenever I'm going to be away from the computer for an hour or more. Rebooting and re-loading all my usual software takes forever. It's a tradeoff I'm willing to make, unless and until it causes a problem.
GB in NC
Kevin W. Miller - 26 Aug 2008 22:49 GMT <snip>
> I greatly prefer "hibernate," which I use whenever I'm going to be > away from the computer for an hour or more. Rebooting and re-loading > all my usual software takes forever. It's a tradeoff I'm willing to > make, unless and until it causes a problem. > > GB in NC For me, if I had to reload software that took "forever", I'd be dumping the software and damn quick about it. I reboot daily and it takes but a few minutes to be back up and running (I even reboot it sometimes when I leave it for an hour). I can't imagine putting up with software that takes "forever" to load but that's just me. When I'm done with the computer for the night (or for an hour, usually) I choose "Start" - "Shut Down" - "Restart". It's ready to go when I'm ready for it.
 Signature Kevin W. Miller http://www.bluemoongemworks.com/rv/index.asp
GBinNC - 26 Aug 2008 23:11 GMT >> I greatly prefer "hibernate," which I use whenever I'm going to be >> away from the computer for an hour or more. Rebooting and re-loading >> all my usual software takes forever. It's a tradeoff I'm willing to >> make, unless and until it causes a problem. >> >> GB in NC
>For me, if I had to reload software that took "forever", I'd be dumping the >software and damn quick about it. I reboot daily and it takes but a few >minutes to be back up and running "Forever" is relative. A few minutes can seem like a long time when you're waiting for something.
>(I even reboot it sometimes when I leave >it for an hour). I can't imagine putting up with software that takes >"forever" to load but that's just me. I don't mean that any particular software program -- or even a combination of programs -- takes that long to load. I mean that to reload everything I routinely keep running takes more time than I care to use up every day (or any more often than I do).
>When I'm done with the computer for >the night (or for an hour, usually) I choose "Start" - "Shut Down" - >"Restart". It's ready to go when I'm ready for it. I don't leave mine running overnight -- except in hibernate mode, that is.
GB in NC
nothermark - 26 Aug 2008 22:55 GMT >I'm getting a "Windows - System Error. There is an IP address conflict >with another system on the network" in a popup message above the tray at [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >TIA. >GB in NC saw the other notes and concur except:
If you are running XP and have the local area connection Icon in the System Tray (lower right corner for me) you can right click that and select "repair". That will do the lease release and renew cycle automatically as well as flush a few other bufffers for you.
GBinNC - 26 Aug 2008 23:12 GMT >If you are running XP and have the local area connection Icon in the >System Tray (lower right corner for me) you can right click that and >select "repair". That will do the lease release and renew cycle >automatically as well as flush a few other bufffers for you. "Repair" doesn't work for this problem. Disable (for 15+ seconds) and then enable apparently did.
GB in NC
Flathead - 27 Aug 2008 03:31 GMT OT, LEARN IT BEMIS
GBinNC - 27 Aug 2008 04:16 GMT > OT, LEARN IT BEMIS Filter me. Please.
GB in NC
Flathead - 27 Aug 2008 14:22 GMT >> OT, LEARN IT BEMIS > > Filter me. Please. > > GB in NC I will not filter you. I filter OT so learn to use it and every on that has OT filtered will be HAPPY. not a chance
GBinNC - 27 Aug 2008 14:49 GMT >> Filter me. Please. >> >> GB in NC
>I will not filter you. I filter OT so learn to use it and every on that has >OT filtered will be HAPPY. I know how to use OT, thank you very much.
However, as of this moment I do not intend to designate future computer networking or connectivity questions as OT. If a significant number of regular posters indicate that doing so for such a topic would be appropriate, I will reconsider.
BTW, what is "BEMIS"?
GB in NC
Flathead - 27 Aug 2008 18:18 GMT >>> Filter me. Please. >>> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > GB in NC You ever hear of Bemis and Butthead>>
Elmer Fudd - 27 Aug 2008 18:38 GMT >>>> Filter me. Please. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >You ever hear of Bemis and >Butthead>> It's BEVIS, you f.cking butthead idiot.
GBinNC - 27 Aug 2008 18:43 GMT >> BTW, what is "BEMIS"? >> >> GB in NC
>You ever hear of Bemis and >Butthead>> No. But I've heard of *Beavis* and *Butt-head* (note correct spellings).
And if I'm Beavis, I guess we know who you are, right <g>?
GB in NC
Hunter Hampton - 27 Aug 2008 23:31 GMT >You ever hear of Bemis and >Butthead>> Um, that's Bevis.
Hunter
GBinNC - 27 Aug 2008 23:50 GMT >>You ever hear of Bemis and >>Butthead>>
>Um, that's Bevis. Close <g>.
GB in NC
Max - 28 Aug 2008 01:15 GMT "GBinNC wrote
, "Flathead" wrote:
>>>You ever hear of Bemis and >>>Butthead>> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > GB in NC Ya'll never heard of "Bemis"? Mark Twain's "Roughing it". chapter 8 When a buffalo climbed a tree http://etext.virginia.edu/railton/roughingit/map/ribuffalo.html
Max
Nate - 27 Aug 2008 17:32 GMT > I'm getting a "Windows - System Error. There is an IP address conflict > with another system on the network" in a popup message above the tray at [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > TIA. > GB in NC I read some of the replies...not all...so this may have already been covered.
Robert is the closest. Pay attention to his responses.
Let's start at the beginning. Your problem may be caused by one of several issues. It's best to understand how it should work so you can properly troubleshoot and then post data we can use to help more efficiently.
When you boot the computer you are booting as a workstation on a network. Some other computer has to be the server. Your workstation can also be a server. Servers are not necessarily what you consider to be a computer. Your router is a server. The ISP has servers...mail, DHCP, HTTP and so forth. Printers can be servers to serve up print services. And each service available on a network can have it's own server for that service. And each can be a workstation too.
A DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) server is used on networks to issue a lease on an IP address that is within it's range of addresses. When set up properly you will tell the DHCP server what IP addresses are available as a range of available IPs (the pool). In a large network I would do this by creating a subnet mask. We won't get into subnet masking for your purposes though. You have a small network. You need maybe 5 IPs...one for you, one for the wife, one for the printer and a couple for other gadgets I have not thought of. Remember that the router that acts as the DHCP server also needs its own IP...that's four now.
The DHCP needs to know the gateway used by computers on the network also. The gateway is how it reaches the internet. And this is where a firewall can create problems. Your modem needs an IP address...but that address is usually provided by the ISP's own DHCP server. That becomes like a static IP address for your internal network (although it is usually not static...the ISP provides it as a dynamic lease, but I just think of it like a static for internal purposes). Remember that leases expire. The expiration time is defined on the DHCP server. If you log in again before it expires then you get the same IP number as you had before. If it's been a while you may get a new address. For security purposes you want the lease to expire rapidly. For ease of use you want a very long lease. Someone has to make a compromise decision. Out of the box, routers made for consumers are usually set to have a long lease period. On my work servers I set the lease to expire every 1 minute. It has a cost, but for my security reason I pay that cost. At home I leave the expiration as set by the manufacturer and I think it is something like a week. I don't care if my neighbors hack my system and get a hold of my porn.
Robert suggested using static IPs on your internal network. This can work to your advantage. But it requires more management. If a friend stops by to visit and asks permission to log onto your wifi then you have to help him set up his network dialogs. Then he goes home and it doesn't work on his network. Or...you have your computer working nicely on your network then you run down to Starbucks to get a cup of nasty coffee and decide to check your mail...you can't get connected. You have to reset your network dialogs. And then remember to set them back to static when you go home. I know this from experience. We use statics at work. I travel a lot on business and try to connect to other people's networks. It's a hassle. But it's not unmanageable.
And the real kicker is if you set the DHCP properly it will fix your problem and at a lower cost.
DHCP keeps a log of the IP addresses it has assigned on the network. It keeps this in a table that stores the MAC address of the machine and the IP assigned to it. I think this is called a Network Address Translation table (NAT). I may be wrong about that. The table is updated according to new leases issued and old leases expiring. When you log in and your lease has not expired your machine wants the same lease it had before. But the server has already assigned that lease somewhere else. But how? It's supposed to keep track of these things. The problem may come up because there are two servers on the network issuing leases. A true network server would see this problem and log an error so we can trouble shoot. The error may tell you it noticed two computers trying to act as the server and has released authority to the other server. But most routers that cost less than 2 grand are not capable of managing that level of authority so you have to do it.
I know that my own system at home has two routers on the network. I asked the phone company to send me a DSL modem that does not act as a DHCP server. It cost 20 bucks less. They sent me the more expensive one because they were sure I did not know what I was doing. Why would I want something less capable? LOL I explained to them that I already have a wireless router and did not need their wireless router. Not because I did not want the higher level of service, but because I knew two routers on the same network would cause a problem.
I was able to shut down DHCP on the phone company's modem and just use my own router (which is way more secure). But now I have to assign gateways for both routers which are different. On the wireless the gateway is the wireless router. But that router has a different gateway...the phone company's router.
If your workstation uses a firewall it becomes another level of routing to keep track of. The DHCP server has to know where the internet is and where each workstation is. It translates the traffic through the NAT table to find each node on the network. A firewall is designed to keep all that information secret. If it hides the address from the DHCP server and the DHCP latter assigns the same address to another node on the network it won't be able to keep the NAT table straight. Traffic becomes jumbled. But it would not generate an error that the address is already in use...not if it can't find the address in the first place because the firewall hides it. But...the firewall has to keep it's own NAT table so it can pass legitimate packets, right? So the firewall may have a lease from one DHCP server and create its own lease for the other side of the network adapter. In this way your computer actually ends up with two IPs for one network adapter. Firewalls can be a software app on your computer or it can be an appliance on your network. I use both. On my appliance it is set up as I described above. One IP address collects all the packets and routes it to the other IP address which sends the packets along to the nodes on the network. I just can't see how a conflict could happen unless I use the same network subnet masks on both sides...which would defeat the purpose of the firewall.
OK...I am getting way too technical now. If any of this rings a bell and leads to more data we can use to troubleshoot...post it up and we will get more specific and less technical from there.
Nate
GBinNC - 27 Aug 2008 19:06 GMT >> Advice, anybody? >> GB in NC
>I read some of the replies...not all...so this may have already been >covered. > >Robert is the closest. Pay attention to his responses. Done.
>Robert suggested using static IPs on your internal network. This can work >to your advantage. But it requires more management. If a friend stops by >to visit and asks permission to log onto your wifi then you have to help him >set up his network dialogs. Then he goes home and it doesn't work on his >network. Not interested in that scenario. Occasionally weekend guests bring laptops and use my WiFi. I want it to be easy for them (and for me).
>Or...you have your computer working nicely on your network then >you run down to Starbucks to get a cup of nasty coffee and decide to check >your mail...you can't get connected. You have to reset your network >dialogs. And then remember to set them back to static when you go home. Not interested in that either. I sometimes use other networks and don't want to have to fool with changing settings.
>And the real kicker is if you set the DHCP properly it will fix your problem >and at a lower cost. ><snipped details> Wow. Thanks for the lengthy explanation and for taking the time to write it out for me. I'll save it until next time the problem arises and then go from there. Right now everything's working fine, and I have many other things that I have to do before Friday (we're entertaining 20 guests for the weekend -- a friend's birthday bash, with his family coming from several other states).
>OK...I am getting way too technical now. LOL. That happened way up near the top....
>If any of this rings a bell and >leads to more data we can use to troubleshoot...post it up and we will get >more specific and less technical from there. Thanks. And if I do, I probably won't mark it OT either <g>....
GB in NC
Lone Haranguer - 27 Aug 2008 19:26 GMT >> I'm getting a "Windows - System Error. There is an IP address conflict >> with another system on the network" in a popup message above the tray at [quoted text clipped - 142 lines] > > Nate I just whack it lightly and delicately with a rubber mallet.
One must show computers just who is in charge.
So far, so good. LZ
Nate - 27 Aug 2008 21:28 GMT > I just whack it lightly and delicately with a rubber mallet. > > One must show computers just who is in charge. > > So far, so good. > LZ Don't be giving away all our trade secrets. If we can keep the customers confused, thinking we have an abundance of talent, we can charge more for the service.
Nate <g>
The Bobert - 29 Aug 2008 23:03 GMT > > I just whack it lightly and delicately with a rubber mallet. > > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Nate <g> Reminds me of the "old Days" when there were *fundamental technical reasons* why it was necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then.
 Signature When the going gets wierd, the wierd turn pro
Bob in Central California
Allan F Damp - 31 Aug 2008 05:22 GMT Officially it's called "percussive maintenance", a procedure I follow frequently.
Frank Damp Anacortes
Robert Bonomi - 31 Aug 2008 19:46 GMT >> > I just whack it lightly and delicately with a rubber mallet. >> > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >Reminds me of the "old Days" when there were *fundamental technical reasons* >why it was necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then. Fruufru!!! NO _wonder_ you have so many SCSI problems! The cannonical treatment for a SCSI chain involved waving a dead chicken over it.
Joe - 27 Aug 2008 17:43 GMT > I'm getting a "Windows - System Error. There is an IP address conflict > with another system on the network" in a popup message above the tray at [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > TIA. > GB in NC I assume your router is DHCP and assigning addresses. If you use cable (wired) and then disconnect and go wireless, your PC may be confused that there is another IP address on the network. Either reboot the PC or open a cmd prompt and type "ipconfig /renew"
Joe
GBinNC - 27 Aug 2008 19:08 GMT >> Advice, anybody? >> >> GB in NC
>I assume your router is DHCP and assigning addresses. If you use >cable (wired) and then disconnect and go wireless, your PC may be >confused that there is another IP address on the network. That wasn't the issue. My computer was cabled and my wife's was wireless -- and neither has been changed lately. And in the past when I have changed from one to the other, there was no problem....
>Either >reboot the PC or open a cmd prompt and type "ipconfig /renew" Rebooting is what I'm trying to avoid, although that seems to work -- as does "disable" and then "enable" again.
Thanks. GB in NC
|
|
|