Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Destinations
USA and CanadaEuropeAustralia and NZAsiaLatin AmericaCaribbean IslandsAfrica
Travel Types
Air TravelCruisesRV Travel

Travel Forum / Travel Types / Air Travel / February 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Round the World trip- should we go Left or Right???

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
KGB - 24 Feb 2006 09:49 GMT
Hi

My wife and I are in the very early stages of thinking about a Round
the World trip.  Apart from New Zealand (I was there many years ago in
the Merchant Navy) and the USA (My wife's brother lives there) we
haven't actually given any thought of any other stopovers as yet, or
direction of travel.

Stopovers are easy to decide on, but out of curiosity, is there a
preferred direction of travel for flying round the World; do we start
from the UK and fly West? - Or is flying East the better option?  What
are people's opinions - West or East and why?

I know that on frequent flights to the US to visit my wife's brother,
I am usually not affected by jet lag after flying West to the USA at
the start of our trip, but I am seriously affected on arriving home
after flying East back to the UK, but cannot decide whether the fact
that jet lag doesn't bother me flying to the US - but does flying home
- is merely the "excitement" of starting a holiday or something
physiological.

Regards

KGB
Miss L. Toe - 24 Feb 2006 11:07 GMT
> Hi
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> KGB

Definately travel West to minimise jet-lag.
But be aware that you will lose a day of your vacation.
If you travel East you will gain a day, but it will come from getting up
early at each stop.
AJC - 24 Feb 2006 11:58 GMT
>> Hi
>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>If you travel East you will gain a day, but it will come from getting up
>early at each stop.

Could be just me, but I always have less jet-lag when I travel East. I
prefer the short days and short nights. I find it easier to come to
terms with that than those endless hours sitting on planes to find
you've only moved on a couple of hours time wise. There is definately
something in the difference between going and comming though, which
ever direction it is.
--==++AJC++==--
Jane - 24 Feb 2006 16:43 GMT
>>> Hi
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> ever direction it is.
> --==++AJC++==--
Definitely travel west. We did this, and we went USA, Fiji, Sydney,
Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Phuket, Bangkok, Dubai, Home.  We never
suffered any jetlag at all.  We did lose that day though which was very
strange. Have a great time, which we were doing it again.

What sort of timing are you allowing too?  We thought we had plenty with
two months, but we were quite surprised at how little time we got to
seeing some of the places we visited in more detail.
Air - 24 Feb 2006 12:06 GMT
The message <43fee95e$0$49817$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net>
from "Miss L. Toe" <missltoemissltoe@hotmail.com> contains these words:

> If you travel East you will gain a day, but it will come from getting up
> early at each stop.

You also get the last leg from the US with more weight allowance for
those trinkets;)

I really have no idea which is 'best', but those I have known do it,
have gone east; none have gone west first.

Signature

Pam

Miss L. Toe - 24 Feb 2006 12:59 GMT
> The message <43fee95e$0$49817$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net>
> from "Miss L. Toe" <missltoemissltoe@hotmail.com> contains these words:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> You also get the last leg from the US with more weight allowance for
> those trinkets;)

You should get the full transatlantic weight allowance for the whole trip.

(But not for any side trips that are not on the RTW ticket)

> I really have no idea which is 'best', but those I have known do it,
> have gone east; none have gone west first.

http://www.statravel.co.uk/cps/rde/xchg/SID-0A536D8E-0BB9FE1A/uk_division_web_li
ve/hs.xsl/914.htm


has a fun RTW planner, and were very helpful to the one person I know who
has done an RTW.
Air - 24 Feb 2006 13:38 GMT
The message <43ff03ab$0$36557$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net>
from "Miss L. Toe" <missltoemissltoe@hotmail.com> contains these words:

> http://www.statravel.co.uk/cps/rde/xchg/SID-0A536D8E-0BB9FE1A/uk_division_web_li
ve/hs.xsl/914.htm

> has a fun RTW planner, and were very helpful to the one person I know who
> has done an RTW.

That is a great link, thanks... got some very reasonable prices from a
few lovely trips... pity I do not have the time to go:(

Signature

Pam

semiretired@my-deja.com - 25 Feb 2006 02:22 GMT
> http://www.statravel.co.uk/cps/rde/xchg/SID-0A536D8E-0BB9FE1A/uk_division_web_li
ve/hs.xsl/914.htm

>has a fun RTW planner, and were very helpful to the one person I know who
>has done an RTW.

There is another RTW planner at  www.airtreks.com
Kristian - 24 Feb 2006 18:53 GMT
>Hi
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>Regards

Have a look at the BA jetlag advisor:
http://www.britishairways.com/travel/arsleepimpact2/public/en_us
http://www.britishairways.com/travel/drsleep/public/en_us?redirect=RD_DRSLEEP
--
Kristian
Jeff Hacker - 24 Feb 2006 20:41 GMT
> Hi
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> - is merely the "excitement" of starting a holiday or something
> physiological.

Westbound from the UK to the US you're flying with the sun; back to the UK
it is an overnight trip with a large time change.  That's why westbound
usually makes more sense to me,   The exception, of course, is from the US
West Coast to Australia/New Zealand, or if you choose an overnight trip from
the UK to Asia/Australia.

> Regards
>
> KGB
Maisie - 26 Feb 2006 21:32 GMT
My friends who have done the trip did west to east and made certain to
ship things home every time they reached a reliable package shipping
spot. They did wind up sticking to parts of the world with fairly
similar (warm) climates though - too much luggage the other way.

Carol
Editor - Lowfares.com
http://www.lowfares.com
Al Bennett - 24 Feb 2006 21:38 GMT
Westbound is far less of a chore on the body & brain, at least in my
experiences.
As one who detests a) ultra long haul flying and b) overnight flights,
going West allows me to avoid overnight flying in almost every
region - even trans-Pacific.
tim (in Sweden) - 25 Feb 2006 10:51 GMT
> Westbound is far less of a chore on the body & brain, at least in my
> experiences.
> As one who detests a) ultra long haul flying and b) overnight flights,
> going West allows me to avoid overnight flying in almost every
> region - even trans-Pacific.

Yep this is what sells it to me too.

The loss of a nights sleep by travelling overnight (having never
successfully slept on a plane) is far more of a problem to me
than the time shift.

tim
Mark Hewitt - 27 Feb 2006 12:25 GMT
>> Westbound is far less of a chore on the body & brain, at least in my
>> experiences.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> successfully slept on a plane) is far more of a problem to me
> than the time shift.

Plus after you spend a long time travelling you also have the benefit of it
being just about time to go to bed, so you can sleep it off!
e.g. When I went London to Seattle I arrived at what was to me about 5am,
but since it was only 9pm there I had the whole night to sleep it off and
when I woke up in the morning I was adjusted, no problem.

Going back is the killer, I've never been so tired in my entire life. So all
the better if you never have to fly the eastbound leg!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.