Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Destinations
USA and CanadaEuropeAustralia and NZAsiaLatin AmericaCaribbean IslandsAfrica
Travel Types
Air TravelCruisesRV Travel

Travel Forum / Destinations / USA and Canada / January 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Las Vegas lodging alternatives in March

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jgmclean@my-dejanews.com - 24 Jan 2005 15:35 GMT
We had some frequent flyer points about to expire, so on a whim we
scheduled a flight to Las Vegas March 11-16.  We have, however, run
into sticker shock trying to find nice lodging, probably due to spring
break markups or some other event.  As first-time visitors we have been
advised to go "where the action is" but it's more important to us to
have a nice (4-star type) place to stay rather than to be right on the
strip.

I will continue fussing with Priceline etc. but don't have much hope.
So, what are some suggested alternatives to the $300/night strip
hotels?  We wouldn't mind staying even an hour or so out somewhere
where we could explore some parks and drive into the city once or
twice.  It'd sure be nice to stay under $100 or so per night.
Thanks

JGM
Claim Guy - 24 Jan 2005 16:31 GMT
> We had some frequent flyer points about to expire, so on a whim we
> scheduled a flight to Las Vegas March 11-16.  We have, however, run
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> twice.  It'd sure be nice to stay under $100 or so per night.
> Thanks

I think you better put your faith in Priceline, cause you're pooched for
those days. And you should be quick about that, too.

I see the J W Marriot Las Vegas Resort coming in at about $250, but that is
it.

4* in Vegas is pricey.
Binyamin Dissen - 24 Jan 2005 17:43 GMT
:>We had some frequent flyer points about to expire, so on a whim we
:>scheduled a flight to Las Vegas March 11-16.  We have, however, run
:>into sticker shock trying to find nice lodging, probably due to spring
:>break markups or some other event.

The weekend before NCAA division I basketball.

Try backing up a week.

Signature

Binyamin Dissen <bdissen@dissensoftware.com>
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

jgmclean@my-dejanews.com - 24 Jan 2005 23:31 GMT
> Try backing up a week.

Too late.  That's why I'm looking for other options.  What's an
interesting place to stay within a few hours' drive?

JGM
miles - 24 Jan 2005 23:53 GMT
>>Try backing up a week.
>
> Too late.  That's why I'm looking for other options.  What's an
> interesting place to stay within a few hours' drive?

Rent a cabin up on Mt. Charlseton about 30 miles from Vegas.  There is
even a small ski area there with great snow this year.  About 2 1/2
hours north of Vegas is Cedar City, UT near the beautiful Cedar Breaks
national monument, Zion National Park and Brian Head ski area.
PeterL - 25 Jan 2005 00:06 GMT
> > Try backing up a week.
>
> Too late.  That's why I'm looking for other options.  What's an
> interesting place to stay within a few hours' drive?

What's the point in going to Vegas if you are staying an hour away?  You may
want to try Stateline.  But again what's the point.

> JGM
tkuniok@calstatela.edu - 25 Jan 2005 05:50 GMT
If you're willing to stay several hours away, that opens up several
possibilities.  In addition to those mentioned elsewhere on this
thread, you could choose St. George, UT.  It's not a very interesting
city in and of itself, but it's only about 90 minutes from North Las
Vegas.  It's less than an hour to Zion National Park, 45 minutes from
Cedar City, an hour or so from the Kolob Canyons scenic drive portion
of Zion National Park, 1 1/2 hours from Bryce Canyon National Park and
45 minutes or so from Nevada's Valley of Fire State Park.

In addition to the previously mentioned "Stateline" [Primm, NV], you
also have Jean, NV.  Nothing four star there, but possibly something
very cheap and just 25 minutes or so from the south Strip.

I suppose Pahrump, NV would also be within an hour.  That would put you
in Nye County, land of legalized brothels.  Also, you'd be within an
hour or so of Death Valley National Park.

Beatty, NV is also less than two hours away from Las Vegas.  It's got
good proximity to Death Valley, and also extreme proximity to Rhyolite
ghost town.

TK
JamesStep - 26 Jan 2005 13:03 GMT
>> somewhere, say, a half-day's drive away
>> for most of the week

>The Grand Canyon is the obvious choice, and for good reason.

Yes, the Grand Canyon would be an excellent choice. It's
about a 5 hour drive from Vegas.  

You'd probably want to go to the *south* rim area (which is
where most tourists visit anyway) as the north rim area
can become snowbound in winter.

Jim

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Remove "NOSPAM" from my address when sending me e-mail.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-
happy camper - 24 Jan 2005 18:57 GMT
> We had some frequent flyer points about to expire, so on a whim we
> scheduled a flight to Las Vegas March 11-16.  We have, however, run
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> JGM

try a vacation rental house!
http://www.vrbo.com/

http://www.vacationrentals.com/

http://www.greatrentals.com/
miles - 24 Jan 2005 23:47 GMT
> We had some frequent flyer points about to expire, so on a whim we
> scheduled a flight to Las Vegas March 11-16.  We have, however, run
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> where we could explore some parks and drive into the city once or
> twice.  It'd sure be nice to stay under $100 or so per night.

Not sure about 4* as they get pricey especially during spring break.
There aren't many places to stay away from vegas either.  We like to
stay at suite rentals off the strip.  They're not 4* because they lack
all the fancy amentities but the rooms are often superior.  Huge rooms
with seperate living, kitchen etc.  Last place we stayed was on Vegas
Blvd. about 5 miles south of  the strip.  Place was called Malibu Suites
but not sure if they changed owners recently.

You can also try getting an upscale suite at one of the Laughlin, NV
casinos.  Laughlin is located about 1 hour south of Vegas along the
Colorado River.  Harrahs and a few others have nice beaches to sit out
on.  Jet ski rentals are also available.  Laughlin is MUCH cheaper than
Vegas even over major weekends.
Gianni Rondinini - 25 Jan 2005 10:36 GMT
>I will continue fussing with Priceline etc. but don't have much hope.
>So, what are some suggested alternatives to the $300/night strip

i haven't checked yet, but usually at excalibur and/or circus circus
rates are far lower than 300/night. we've never spent more than 80/100
usd/night --even in "hot days"--.

http://www.circuscircus.com
http://www.excalibur.com

regards,
Signature

Gianni Rondinini
Icem s.r.l. - http://www.icem.it
Tel: +39 0545 78036
Fax: +39 0545 78727

JamesStep - 25 Jan 2005 14:13 GMT
>it's more important to us to have a nice
>(4-star type) place to stay rather than to
>be right on the strip.... It'd sure be nice to
>stay under $100 or so per night...We wouldn't
>mind staying even an hour or so out somewhere

I'd suggest *not* staying "an hour or so" out of town just
to save a few bucks, unless it's near an attraction where
you plan to spend most of your time anyway. It's just not
worth the inconvenience.  And don't forget that Vegas is
in the desert. There aren't a lot of motels once you leave
the city unless you go all the way to another town.

Find a moderately-priced hotel in the city and use that as
your base of operations. Look at hotels that are in the
city but away from the strip, as rooms on the strip tend
to be higher-priced due to their location.  If you want to
stay at a "4-star type" place, be very wary of bargain-
priced hotels on the strip (Circus Circus, etc.) as they
are cheaper mostly because they aren't as nice. Stay in
another part of town where hotel prices are lower.

You can find some good info about Vegas hotels at
<cheapovegas.com>.  You also might want to visit the
Las Vegas newsgroup.

Jim

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Remove "NOSPAM" from my address when sending me e-mail.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-
PTravel - 25 Jan 2005 18:53 GMT
> >I will continue fussing with Priceline etc. but don't have much hope.
> >So, what are some suggested alternatives to the $300/night strip
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> http://www.circuscircus.com
> http://www.excalibur.com

Without question, among the worst properties on the strip (particularly
Circus Circus).  The OP would do much better staying at a decent off-strip
property -- one of the Station Casinos, Green Valley Ranch, etc.

> regards,
Gianni Rondinini - 27 Jan 2005 10:02 GMT
>> http://www.circuscircus.com
>> http://www.excalibur.com
>
>Without question, among the worst properties on the strip (particularly

it's not the bellagio, but it didn't seem me that bad.
what's *so* wrong with circus circus? we spent 7 days there in 2
different travels to usa --4+3 nights-- and we're still alive and
happy. we had no problems of any kind with that hotel: the only pity
is that it's so far from the "center" of the strip --and we had to
walk quite a bit--.

i'm asking just to learn and understand, since we planned to spend 6
nights in excalibur this summer.

>Circus Circus).  The OP would do much better staying at a decent off-strip

OP = ?

regards!
Signature

Gianni Rondinini
Icem s.r.l. - http://www.icem.it
Tel: +39 0545 78036
Fax: +39 0545 78727

Claim Guy - 27 Jan 2005 12:49 GMT
> >> http://www.circuscircus.com
> >> http://www.excalibur.com
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> OP = ?

Gianni;

It's not that there are obvious "problems" with Circus Circus and Excalibur,
it is just that they are older properties, geared more to families, and they
are not equivalent in standards to most of the other properties. You will
find more luxurious rooms and facilities at the other name properties. Since
you have been there, you know what you are getting, so you will not have any
issues.

Excalibur is a nicer property than Circus Circus, in my opinion, and it is
certainly better positioned on the strip.

"OP" means "original poster" - the person who made the first post and
started the thread.
JamesStep - 27 Jan 2005 15:53 GMT
> what's *so* wrong with circus circus?
> we spent 7 days there...[and] had no problems

It depends to some extent on which section of the hotel
they put you in. Some of the newer rooms are ok, but
many others just aren't up to the standards of most
of the other hotels on the strip.

If you're curious, there are several web sites that compare
the various hotels on the strip. For example:

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Remove "NOSPAM" from my address when sending me e-mail.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-
JamesStep - 27 Jan 2005 15:57 GMT
Sorry, hit Send too soon.

In my previous post when I was talking about Circus Circus,
I was going to add that several web sites offer comparisons
of the various hotels on the strip. For example, check out the
comparison info at:

cheapovegas.com

Jim

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Remove "NOSPAM" from my address when sending me e-mail.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-
Gianni Rondinini - 28 Jan 2005 14:08 GMT
>Sorry, hit Send too soon.

no problem. thank you for the link: i'll look it deeply this evening.

bye!
Signature

Gianni Rondinini
Icem s.r.l. - http://www.icem.it
Tel: +39 0545 78036
Fax: +39 0545 78727

Gianni Rondinini - 28 Jan 2005 14:08 GMT
>It's not that there are obvious "problems" with Circus Circus and Excalibur,
>it is just that they are older properties, geared more to families, and they
>are not equivalent in standards to most of the other properties. You will

ok, i understand. we used our hotel room only to sleep and store our
luggage but we spent just few hours in that and a comfortable bed and
a big tv with cable was enough for us.
iovho, we thought that in vegas you go sightseeing, shopping,
gambling, taking photos, watching shows, then we didn't mind too much
"extras" or amenities offered by other hotels.

being sincere, we've spent also a couple of nights in luxor [1] and
yes: it was different from circus circus :)
and i understand that more expensive hotels are even better [2]

>find more luxurious rooms and facilities at the other name properties. Since
>you have been there, you know what you are getting, so you will not have any
>issues.
>
>Excalibur is a nicer property than Circus Circus, in my opinion, and it is
>certainly better positioned on the strip.

yes, it definitely is. we used to stay in circus circus because it's
very el-cheapo both as rooms and as bj tables: we've played 3usd/hand
at the beginning of the evening and then 5usd/hand. the average dealer
was also very pleasant: we joked, we talked, we laughed... i'm not
sure that a 500usd/hand table the dealer would scream for my blackjack
;) or would he?
we're not "experienced" gamblers nor we play bj to win anything, but
being able to play an hour with our 50 bucks instead of loosing them
in 5 minutes is far funnier :)

said this, we realized this summer that 5$ bj tables are also in
excalibur and somewhere else and room rates are almost the same in cc
and excalibur. considering the better position on the strip we plan to
go to excalibur.

>"OP" means "original poster" - the person who made the first post and
>started the thread.

thank you :) i've been reading usenet groups for almost 10 years but i
still miss some abbreviations :)
localized groups are 'net's ruin ;)

bye!

[1] we've spent 1 night in an ordinary room inside the piramid: it was
very nice; but the one-bed pharaoh suite is really *astonishing*.
we've been very lucky because when we moved to vegas last year we
booked an ordinary room inside the piramid, but due to some
conferences --or whatever else i didn't remember-- there were no free
rooms (!!!) and they gave us "a free room upgrade". when the lady at
check in told us our room was in west tower we got sad because we
*really* wanted a room in the piramid, but after entering and seeing
our suite we changed rapidly idea ;)
i can't even imagine a big suite in venetian, caesar's palace,
mirage... and i can't imagine somebody being able to afford it! :D
[2] while walking along the strip we entered some casinos inside
different hotels and at the venetian we saw some girls bringing
cocktails to gamblers that we've never seen even in tv. they were
something really special :)
Signature

Gianni Rondinini
Icem s.r.l. - http://www.icem.it
Tel: +39 0545 78036
Fax: +39 0545 78727

PTravel - 27 Jan 2005 17:52 GMT
> >> http://www.circuscircus.com
> >> http://www.excalibur.com
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> is that it's so far from the "center" of the strip --and we had to
> walk quite a bit--.

There are a number of problems with Circus Circus.  It's one of the older
properties on the strip.  If you go over to alt.vacation.las-vegas, you'll
see that, though the new tower rooms are considered adequate, the rest of
the property is dirty (not just shabby, but dirty).  The property makes a
conscious effort to attract the family crowd and, as a consequence, it is
over-run by children.  The buffet is considered to be one of the worst on
the Strip, if not actually one of the worst in Vegas.  It's location, at the
north end of the Strip, is inconvenient to all the other "mainline" casinos,
except, perhaps Treasure Island, the Mirage and the Venetian.

Overall, Circus Circus has the reputation of being a bargain-seeker,
families-with-children, trailer-park kind of place.  Excalibur is only
slightly above Circus Circus.

For those who need budget accomodation on the Strip, there are far better
alternatives.  Many people like the Imperial, though it's not one I would
consider staying at.  When I want inexpensive digs in Las Vegas, I stay at
the Flamingo or Ballys, both of which are vastly superior to Circus
Circus -- cleaner, nicer rooms, reasonable eating options, only the usual
number of familes with small kids, etc.  Both of them are smack in the
middle of the strip, putting all the other casinos (except, perhaps,
Mandalay Bay) in relatively easy walking distance.  A step up from the
Flamingo and Ballys would be Monte Carlo, which is only a little more
expensive and quite a nice hotel casino.

> i'm asking just to learn and understand, since we planned to spend 6
> nights in excalibur this summer.

Excalibur, like Circus Circus (and they're both owned by the same company)
focuses on the family crowd, meaning there are far more young kids than
usual.  Most people agree that children and Las Vegas are not a particularly
good combination, not just from the standpoint of the kids, but also from
the perspective of the adults who travel to Las Vegas to enjoy an adult
(which does not necessarily mean x-rated) experience.

Excalibur is also reported as being shabby and dirty, though not to the
extent of Circus Circus.  It's location isn't horrible, but it is down at
the southern end of the strip.  You'll have easy access to New York New
York, the Luxor, MGM and Mandalay Bay.  However, it will be quite a long
hike to Caesars, the Mirage, and the Venetian.

Seriously, I'd recommend you consider either the Flamingo or Ballys.  I
really think you'll enjoy your stay more.  Prices will be comparable, the
properties are much nicer, you won't be dodging tantrum-throwing toddlers
and strollers to the extent you would at Excalibur, and you'll have better
access to the rest of the Strip.

Take a look at alt.vacation.las-vegas.  You'll see that, though there are a
few defenders of Circus Circus and Excalibur (who do so primarily by
stating, "the room was clean and all I do is sleep there, so I don't care
about the rest of the property), my description of these hotels represents
the orthodox view.

> >Circus Circus).  The OP would do much better staying at a decent off-strip
>
> OP = ?

Newsgroup-speak for "original poster," i.e. the person who started the
thread.

> regards!
Gianni Rondinini - 28 Jan 2005 14:14 GMT
[...]
>Seriously, I'd recommend you consider either the Flamingo or Ballys.  I
>really think you'll enjoy your stay more.  Prices will be comparable, the

thank you very much for your post. i read many interesting things and
will change our plan. we'll check for flamingo and ballys websites for
the reservation and prices --100 or 200$/night for 6 nights every two
years makes no big difference for us, but this summer we'll travel
with a couple of friends who can hardly save even the money for
flight...--.

bye!
Signature

Gianni Rondinini
Icem s.r.l. - http://www.icem.it
Tel: +39 0545 78036
Fax: +39 0545 78727

Icono Clast - 25 Jan 2005 11:57 GMT
> As first-time visitors we have been advised to go "where the
> action is" but it's more important to us to have a nice (4-star
> type) place to stay rather than to be right on the strip.

We stay at the Lucky Lady about a block North of Fremont Street. It's
probably not four-star (I don't really know what that means) but it
is where the action is.

PeterL said:
> You may want to try Stateline.

That's hundreds of miles from 'Vegas. State Line (aka Primm),
however, is about thirty miles from 'Vegas and has three
hotels/casinos and Jean is even closer with, I think, two hotels/casinos.

For additional information on hotels and non-gambling Las Vegas,
please visit the Las Vegas page
<http://geocities.com/iconoc/Articles/LasVegas.html>

page at the site at Right in the sig.
____________________________________________________________
      A San Franciscan in (where else?) San Francisco
http://geocities.com/dancefest/  http://geocities.com/iconoc/
ICQ: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103   IClast at SFbay Net
PTravel - 25 Jan 2005 18:55 GMT
> > As first-time visitors we have been advised to go "where the
> > action is" but it's more important to us to have a nice (4-star
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> That's hundreds of miles from 'Vegas. State Line (aka Primm),

The OP should know that you're speaking metaphorically, not literally.  As
you've noted, Primm is only 30 miles or so from Las Vegas.

Jean is another good suggestion, situated half-way between Primm and LV.
> however, is about thirty miles from 'Vegas and has three
> hotels/casinos and Jean is even closer with, I think, two hotels/casinos.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> http://geocities.com/dancefest/  http://geocities.com/iconoc/
> ICQ: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103   IClast at SFbay Net
Icono Clast - 26 Jan 2005 10:20 GMT
>> PeterL said:
>>> You may want to try Stateline.
>
> The OP should know that you're speaking metaphorically, not
> literally.

You should know that I am not! US Highway 50 is the main drag in
Stateline. InterState Highway 15 is the main drag in State Line. From
one to the other is almost 500 miles.

>> For additional information on hotels and non-gambling Las Vegas,
>> please visit the Las Vegas page
>> <http://geocities.com/iconoc/Articles/LasVegas.html>
>>
>> page at the site at Right in the sig.
____________________________________________________________
       A San Franciscan in (where else?) San Francisco
http://geocities.com/dancefest/  http://geocities.com/iconoc/
ICQ: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103   IClast at SFbay Net
PTravel - 25 Jan 2005 18:52 GMT
> We had some frequent flyer points about to expire, so on a whim we
> scheduled a flight to Las Vegas March 11-16.  We have, however, run
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> JGM

What you're looking for is mutually exclusive -- low price and 4-star.

Take a look at properties in Primm (formerly Stateline).  It's about 40
minutes outside of Las Vegas, and features lower-priced, but new and
reasonably nice, hotel casinos.  Do no, however, expect the Venetian or
Bellagio.  You also might try the Station Casinos.  These are primarily
locals places, but have less-expensive hotels attached.  They're scattered
around the outskirts of Las Vegas.
jgmclean@my-dejanews.com - 25 Jan 2005 22:16 GMT
> So, what are some suggested alternatives to the $300/night strip
> hotels?

Thanks *very much* for all the thoughtful replies.  Reading through
them, I think I wasn't too clear on one thing: we don't really care too
much *where* we wind up, as long as it's nice and interesting.  We are
not intent on gambling or even spending lots of time on the strip.  We
just picked Vegas on a whim, if it is not going to work out staying
there, that's fine -- though we are stuck flying in there and will
check it out at least for a day.

In other words, I'd rather be somewhere, say, a half-day's drive away
for most of the week if there is a nice place to stay and neat stuff to
do, than stay in a marginal place and try to commute to Vegas every
day.  The advice to look over towards Zion is exactly what I was
thinking -- any further specific ideas in that direction would be
great.
Thanks again, I'm looking into several things you all mentioned.

JGM
Claim Guy - 26 Jan 2005 01:40 GMT
> Thanks *very much* for all the thoughtful replies.  Reading through
> them, I think I wasn't too clear on one thing: we don't really care too
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> great.
> Thanks again, I'm looking into several things you all mentioned.

Okay, that is clearer.

I suppose you know that LA is only about 4 hours from Vegas - that would be
half a day's drive, but I won't go there.

If you like the idea of Zion, go for it. The best, really the only place to
stay is the town of Springdale, right on the doorstep. There are some really
nice accommodations there - the Desert Pearl, for example. If you would like
to hike and gawk in the cool early spring air, the place can't be beat.

Springdale is about 2 1/2 hours from Vegas
Nile - 26 Jan 2005 05:36 GMT
jgmclean wrote:

>>>somewhere, say, a half-day's drive away for most of the week

The Grand Canyon is the obvious choice, and for good reason.
scharf@hotmail.com - 29 Jan 2005 00:57 GMT
> We had some frequent flyer points about to expire, so on a whim we
> scheduled a flight to Las Vegas March 11-16.  We have, however, run
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> have a nice (4-star type) place to stay rather than to be right on the
> strip.

I don't know of any four star hotels off the strip. Even on the strip,
there are plenty of 1-2 star hotels, such as Excalibur, Frontier,
Circus Circus, Sahara, Stratosphere (not really on the strip, though
they claim they are).

Someone suggested Stateline, which is about 35 miles from Las Vegas,
but there are no four star hotels there. Similarly, in Springdale there
are no four star hotels.

I think that you'll have to go to Laughlin to find what you want.
It's too bad that the Tam 'O Shanter is gone, a true half-star hotel.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.