Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Destinations
USA and CanadaEuropeAustralia and NZAsiaLatin AmericaCaribbean IslandsAfrica
Travel Types
Air TravelCruisesRV Travel

Travel Forum / Destinations / USA and Canada / April 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Minimum Prison times

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
eustacebulldogs@hotmail.com - 21 Apr 2006 01:48 GMT
Stephen Harper wants Minimum Prision Times for drug offences. Thats a
smart idea. Waste the tax payers money on sending people who deal with
other people who use drugs.

Let Me tell you something. Sending drug dealers to jail does nothing.
People will still be using drugs, you can't stop it. Now I'm not a drug
user myself. But I know enough about drugs that people in the United
States are serving 25 years for selling narcotics, but yet there are
still people who sell and consume drugs. It costs the Canadian
Government about $40 a day for someone to stay in jail. Thats more then
what people on welfare get.

And what do the drug dealers learn when they are in jail? They learn
other criminal activies  fact of the matter is 80% of people who go to
jail once will end up there again. Probably because no one wants to
hire someone who has a criminal record.

So lets do some simple math. You take one drug dealer, who wasen't
hurting anyone but the users who want the drugs anyways. They get used
to making a good salary, they spend alot of money on clothes, cars,
clubs, lotteries. They buy houses and have families  etc.(basicly
generating alot of revenue and spreading it around which is excellent
for the economy)

Then you take them off of the street and feed them and care for them in
the jail system. When they get out, they have nothing and can't get a
good career because they have a criminal record. So they do what they
learned in jail, they'll steal cars, rob houses and corner stores.
Causing a much bigger problem.

In case you haven't noticed drug dealers seldom fight each other, it's
bad for business and if they do it's one dealer to another. Bad things
only happen when the police get involved. When they go to jail they
meet murderers, armed robbers, rapists etc. giving them a "criminal
education".

So who is causing the crime now? Stephen Harper, there is much bigger
issues to deal with... like the enviroment, so lay off of the dealers
and save Canada's money to save the enviroment, our streets don't need
saving.
Alan S - 21 Apr 2006 02:07 GMT
>Let Me tell you something.

No, let me tell you something.

I don't know who Stephen Harper is, nor do I care. But if he
is advocating minimum prison time for morons who post
country-specific political crap on international newsgroups
without the courtesy of an OT - then send me an absentee
postal voting form. I'll vote for him.

Cheers, Alan, Australia
Sapphyre - 21 Apr 2006 02:16 GMT
Hehehe, that's really funny... If I knew how to add the OT to my title
I would, but I'm a posting moron who uses Google.

The political stuff is Canadian, and the OP probably posted it here
because of some kind of agreement in progress between Canada and the
US. Maybe he wanted to warn drug dealers in the US not to travel to
Canada to earn their living...
sechumlib - 21 Apr 2006 02:33 GMT
> I don't know who Stephen Harper is, nor do I care.

Prime Minister of Canada. Sorry to burden you with that. Guess world
news doesn't seep through to Australia.
Alan S - 21 Apr 2006 04:02 GMT
>> I don't know who Stephen Harper is, nor do I care.
>
>Prime Minister of Canada. Sorry to burden you with that. Guess world
>news doesn't seep through to Australia.

Nah, news of small-time politicians in the frozen north
doesn't interest us a lot. We don't even care if they're
Quebecois or not.

We're more concerned at the moment with our troops and
police together with the Kiwis trying to sort out anarchy in
the Solomons, the extra troops off to Afghanistan and Iraq,
strained relations with our populous northern Islamic
neighbour over the West Irian matter, US/China relationships
and their implications for our trade, the Islamic extremist
situation in Thailand, the revolution in Nepal, military
manoeuvres and threatening situations in the islands between
Japan and South Korea, the North Korean nuclear problem -
and, of course, much more important, the cricket score from
Bangla Desh.

So yeah, we're pretty focused on local stuff. I'm afraid the
thoughts of small-time northern politicians on small-time
drug offenders comes way behind the Bangla Desh cricket
score:-)

If that's what he wants to do, tell him to google for
details of the "Bali 9" or "Schappelle Corby". The
precedents set in Bali should cheer him up no end.

Cheers, Alan, Australia
Sapphyre - 21 Apr 2006 02:14 GMT
If you can find a better way to make drugs go away and stay out of our
country (Canada), then please do suggest it...

Consider this, when I was 14, some kid at my highschool suggested I try
some drugs and have a "trip". I'm so paranoid that I won't even take
food from a classmate, for fear it's poisoned or something, so no way
was I going to touch his drugs. But many people did touch his drugs,
and I know of people who regret ever having done them. Not because they
decided, "hey, I want to try coke, so where can I find it?" But because
these people, some day in their life, were minding their own business
and someone told them, "try this, you'll feel better". Educating kids
helps, but telling kids how drugs hurt them will not prevent them from
trying them. Self-esteem and self-worth are more valuable tools, and
I'm thankful that I had a strong personality to decide before an offer
was made, that I will never touch drugs.

So I only see two ways to try and fix this problem... legalizing, which
is not a very smart idea, but it will fix some problems. And
irradicating... if it's not there, it can't hurt anyone.

For what it's worth, someone who is very close to me is serving time
because he got messed up, someone offered him drugs, he thought it was
a good fix to his problem, and while on these drugs that he thought he
needed, he beat another person senseless. I have not seen this person
in six years, except for some mail contact... He was the best friend
and "big brother" I could ever hope for, until he got messed up on
drugs. Now he's paying the price and living with the regret of his
actions. At least five years after his sentence discharge, he can have
his record erased, but it will be a hard five years to do something
with his life before then. He's been down since he was 21, and never
had a chance in life to make something of himself before he lost the
opportunity.

So don't say that drug dealers aren't hurting anyone... someone always
gets hurt in the end.
Carole Allen - 21 Apr 2006 02:22 GMT
>If you can find a better way to make drugs go away and stay out of our
>country (Canada), then please do suggest it...

Hmm, they are smuggling the stuff OUT of Canada into the states -
especially BC Bud...there are busts all the time in the NW
Sapphyre - 21 Apr 2006 03:44 GMT
That's stuff that's grown up here... I don't know enough about the
cause and effect of pot. The stuff that scares me is cocaine &
derivatives, methamphetamine (sp?) and other similar "home manufactured
chemicals" (which can be made anywhere you have those basic household
chemicals), LSD & PCP (and other hallucogens), and heroin. I'm sure
there are other drugs I don't know about, but as far as I know, we
aren't growing cocoa plant in Canada.
Douglas W. Hoyt - 21 Apr 2006 03:11 GMT
>>>>Self-esteem and self-worth are more valuable tools, and I'm thankful
>>>>that I had a strong personality to decide before an offer was made, that
>>>>I will never touch drugs.

And all of us on this newsgroup are now the benefit of THAT.
Alohacyberian - 21 Apr 2006 05:09 GMT
> So lets do some simple math. You take one drug dealer, who wasen't
> hurting anyone but the users who want the drugs anyways.

Uh-huh.  The dealer who sold the stuff to the drugged up wacko who runs over
your daughter with his car isn't hurting anyone?  The doper who introduces
your daughter to drugs and starts her off on an addicted living nightmare
isn't hurting anyone?  KM
Signature

(-:alohacyberian:-)  At my website there are 3600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI or
CNN, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards & 150 foreign languages
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more:  http://keith.martin.home.att.net/

garciyalater@hotmail.com - 21 Apr 2006 13:09 GMT
Uh-huh.  The dealer who sold the stuff to the drugged up wacko who runs
over
your daughter with his car isn't hurting anyone?  The doper who
introduces
your daughter to drugs and starts her off on an addicted living
nightmare
isn't hurting anyone?  KM >>>>>>>

funny thing is, if he was to repeatedly rape and sodomize your daughter
over the course of a weekend, he would likely do less time than if he
sold her a kilo of cocaine......sound crazy?  It is...........

And how bout the liquor store owner who sells a bottle of whiskey to
the drunk who runs his car into the drugged up wacko who is taking care
of business on your daughter.  Should the liqour store owner be held
accountable.

Liqour has been shown to be far more addictive/dangerous than
marijuana.  Get your head out of you a.s if you think casual drug
dealing is a serious offense.

Chuck
Alohacyberian - 22 Apr 2006 10:40 GMT
> Uh-huh.  The dealer who sold the stuff to the drugged up wacko who runs
> over
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> marijuana.  Get your head out of you a.s if you think casual drug
> dealing is a serious offense.

OK, so you're a doper and want to ignore the drugs you don't use and want to
believe that most pushers are "casual" because you don't have a daughter and
never will have one because your one true love is drugs.  Methinks she doth
protest too much, but, you too, may come to discover that nothing law
enforcement can do to you will ever be as horrendous as what drugs can do to
you, though you may not be around to tell the story.  KM
Signature

(-:alohacyberian:-)  At my website there are 3600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI or
CNN, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards & 150 foreign languages
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more:  http://keith.martin.home.att.net/

garciyalater@hotmail.com - 25 Apr 2006 18:06 GMT
nothing law enforcement can do to you will ever be as horrendous as
what drugs can do to you, though you may not be around to tell the
story.  KM>>>>>

you are so full of sh.t is laughable.  Law enforcemtn has killed more
people with taser guns in the past six months than have died from
Marijuana since the begining of time.

Do tell, with your ultimate wisdom, what are the dangers of pot use?
Hmmm......cant think of any?  Hmmm....maybe there are none?

FWIW, I use a vaperizor, so I have little risk of lung disease so dont
bother going there......

Chuck
Alohacyberian - 26 Apr 2006 03:24 GMT
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more:  http://keith.martin.home.att.net/
> nothing law enforcement can do to you will ever be as horrendous as
> what drugs can do to you, though you may not be around to tell the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Do tell, with your ultimate wisdom, what are the dangers of pot use?
> Hmmm......cant think of any?  Hmmm....maybe there are none?

Guess, again.  Literally millions of drug addicts have readily admitted they
got started on drugs of abuse with marijuana.  Drug treatment facilities
literally make billions of dollars annually treating drug dependence and
many of their patients will quickly admit they were addicted to marijuana.
The myth that the drug is what determines addiction needs to be dispelled:
it's the body the drug is put into that determines addiction.  Those who
never ingest the drug, never find out if it's addicting or not.  All you're
saying is that you are a grasshopper who consumes marijuana and you don't
want to go to jail for being unable to cope with life without drugs.  The
rest of us may choose to live drug free and don't have to worry about law
enforcement's taser guns or the tragic effects of drug abuse.  KM
Signature

(-:alohacyberian:-)  At my website there are 3600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI or
CNN, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards & 150 foreign languages

Dave Smith - 26 Apr 2006 03:59 GMT
> > Do tell, with your ultimate wisdom, what are the dangers of pot use?
> > Hmmm......cant think of any?  Hmmm....maybe there are none?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> literally make billions of dollars annually treating drug dependence and
> many of their patients will quickly admit they were addicted to marijuana.

Oh goodie... interviews with drug addicts looking for someone or something to
blame for their addictive behaviour.  Even more millions of pot smokers never
went on to other drugs, except legally accessible alcohol. Many pot smokes grew
out of the phase and simple gave it up for lack of interest.

> The myth that the drug is what determines addiction needs to be dispelled:
> it's the body the drug is put into that determines addiction.  Those who
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> rest of us may choose to live drug free and don't have to worry about law
> enforcement's taser guns or the tragic effects of drug abuse.  KM

Drug free????? No beer? No wine? No cigarettes or coffee?
garciyalater@hotmail.com - 26 Apr 2006 14:42 GMT
All you're > saying is that you are a grasshopper who consumes
marijuana and you don't
> want to go to jail for being unable to cope with life without drugs.  The
> rest of us may choose to live drug free and don't have to worry about law
> enforcement's taser guns or the tragic effects of drug abuse.

the rest of you may choose to be drug free, but I wouldnt say you are
safe from the taser gun........they dont just use it on drug offenders
you know....if airline pilots made as many mistakes as police, dozens
of planes would drop from the sky every day.....dont assume you wont
end up on the wrong end of the taser/cuffs just because you are
innocent.

Chuck
Alohacyberian - 27 Apr 2006 05:31 GMT
> All you're > saying is that you are a grasshopper who consumes
> marijuana and you don't
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the rest of you may choose to be drug free, but I wouldnt say you are
> safe from the taser gun.......

Yeah, well it isn't anything I worry about.  I doubt seriously if people
with taser guns wander around aimlessly looking for random targets.  Even if
they do, I'm still not worried.  KM
Signature

(-:alohacyberian:-)  At my website there are 3600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI or
CNN, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards & 150 foreign languages
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more:  http://keith.martin.home.att.net/

Alohacyberian - 27 Apr 2006 05:31 GMT
>> Guess, again.  Literally millions of drug addicts have readily admitted
>> they
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> never
> went on to other drugs,

Yet.  Sorry, but most recovered and recovering drug addicts blame no one but
themselves.  Have a toke on me.  KM
Signature

(-:alohacyberian:-)  At my website there are 3600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI or
CNN, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards & 150 foreign languages
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more:  http://keith.martin.home.att.net/

Dave Smith - 27 Apr 2006 14:25 GMT
> > Oh goodie... interviews with drug addicts looking for someone or something
> > to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Yet.  Sorry, but most recovered and recovering drug addicts blame no one but
> themselves.  Have a toke on me.  KM

So it wasn't the pot?
garciyalater@hotmail.com - 26 Apr 2006 14:37 GMT
Guess, again.  Literally millions of drug addicts have readily admitted
they
got started on drugs of abuse with marijuana.>>>>>>>

So the only negative consequence you can come up with is the tired old
gateway drug theory?  How bout as Dave pointed out, the millions and
millions of pot heads who never get into other stuff and lead perfectly
normal lives.  I would bet far more people would point to alcohol and
even gambling as being a bigger problem in their lives than weed.

You are exactly the type of the person the govt loves.  To stupid to
form your own opionin based on fact and eager as hell to eat up the
misinformation that they put out.  Pot is illegal because mexicans and
blacks were turning on white women with it.  That is a fact.  

Chuck
Alohacyberian - 27 Apr 2006 07:37 GMT
> Guess, again.  Literally millions of drug addicts have readily admitted
> they
> got started on drugs of abuse with marijuana.>>>>>>>
>
> So the only negative consequence you can come up with is the tired old

No, that wasn't the only one by a long shot, but, this is a travel
newsgroup, not a forum to promote illegal and dangerous drugs.  So if you
want to connect with other losers who can't get through the week or the day
without mind altering chemicals, be my guest, but this isn't the proper
venue to seek people of like mindlessness.  KM
Signature

(-:alohacyberian:-)  At my website there are 3600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI or
CNN, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards & 150 foreign languages
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more:  http://keith.martin.home.att.net/

Dave Smith - 21 Apr 2006 18:50 GMT
> > So lets do some simple math. You take one drug dealer, who wasen't
> > hurting anyone but the users who want the drugs anyways.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> your daughter to drugs and starts her off on an addicted living nightmare
> isn't hurting anyone?  KM

What kind of drugs are you talking about? Pot does not turn people into raving
lunatics.  Pot is not addictive.  Alcohol is responsible for more health,
personal, family, work, criminal problems and accidents than all illegal drugs
combines.  Get a grip. Smoking a bit of pot once in a while should not be
considered a crime any more than having a beer.
Alohacyberian - 22 Apr 2006 10:40 GMT
>> > So lets do some simple math. You take one drug dealer, who wasen't
>> > hurting anyone but the users who want the drugs anyways.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> raving
> lunatics.  Pot is not addictive.  Alcohol is responsible for more health,

OK, so you smoke a lot of pot and may even sell it, so you want the world to
have a different set of laws regarding pot than for other dangerous drugs.
Talk to your legislators, not a newsgroup.  And your tired old illogic that
points out the dangers and shortcomings of alcohol as that somehow will
erase the horror stories about pot became weary about 40 years ago.  Rather
than attacking alcohol, it might be more beneficial for you to concentrate
on your own problem:  marijuana - or might that be too painful and rob you
of your denial?  KM
Signature

(-:alohacyberian:-)  At my website there are 3600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI or
CNN, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards & 150 foreign languages
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more:  http://keith.martin.home.att.net/

Dave Smith - 22 Apr 2006 13:51 GMT
> OK, so you smoke a lot of pot and may even sell it, so you want the world to
> have a different set of laws regarding pot than for other dangerous drugs.
> Talk to your legislators, not a newsgroup.  And your tired old illogic that
> points out the dangers and shortcomings of alcohol as that somehow will
> erase the horror stories about pot became weary about 40 years ago.

Is it illogic to oppose the criminalization of a vice bases of puritan attitudes
and false information?

> Rather
> than attacking alcohol, it might be more beneficial for you to concentrate
> on your own problem:  marijuana - or might that be too painful and rob you
> of your denial?  KM

Pointing out that alcohol is a much larger social problem than marijuana is not
an attack. It is just the truth. I don't have a drug problem.  You won't find
any pot in my possession or any trace of it in my system.
garciyalater@hotmail.com - 25 Apr 2006 18:03 GMT
OK, so you smoke a lot of pot and may even sell it, so you want the
world to
have a different set of laws regarding pot than for other dangerous
drugs.>>>>>>>

There should be a different set of laws for pot.  It is not dangerous.
PERIOD.  In the time it takes you to read this post, the govt has lost
hundreds of thousands of dollars in revenue that could have been
earned.  Noone is calling for legalization, that is a stupid notion.
decriminilization, on the other hand, is the only sensible option.

Chuck
garciyalater@hotmail.com - 28 Apr 2006 19:43 GMT
this is gonna piss off a lot of people......

even less spring breakers going to FLA for sure......

I know I will vacation in mexico again for sure....not for the
coke/heroin, but the pot.....

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,193616,00.html
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.