You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free TravelKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Full time campers in state parks
| Carl A. in FL | 07 Jul 2009 01:54 |
> Yeah, I suspect you wouldn't. In the first place I'm so low that I > object to accusing some one of being a pedophile unless there's some [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > TB No, it's because you are so dishonest that you misinterpret context, and so incredibly stupid that you don't comprehend a "reductio ad absurdum" statement.
Gar's jumping into a discussion and supporting an unsupportable accusation was at precisely the same level of inappropriateness as my absurd accusation to him. I'm sure you understood that but in your usualy dishonest fashion chose to misinterpret.
Now, go practice your perversions on someone sick enough to appreciate it..
Carl A. in FL http://sky.prohosting.com/chainfl/
|
| Technobarbarian | 06 Jul 2009 22:05 |
>>>>>>> Dang Carl, that person is just a troll, but somehow you had to bring >>>>>>> Hunter into the non-existent conversation. Naughty naughty. [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > Context. Sorry you can't grasp that. Go spank someone. Oh, I understand completely. You're so disinhibited on usenet that you'll post all sorts of filth that you would never say to someone's face and so egotistical that you think you can throw mud far more vile than the stuff you're complaining about without having any of it stick to you.
The context of the accusation you threw at Gar was that you misunderstood what he said. Under what circumstances is it ok to accuse someone of being a pedophile when you have no basis for the accusation? Is it ok when that's the only way you can think of to escalate the insults? In what context is the word "slut" ok here? I'd really like to know so we have some rational basis to distinguish the "sluts, trash, and trolls" who use FU and such from the nice people using those phrases.
> I don't think I'd want to share a campfire with you. Yeah, I suspect you wouldn't. In the first place I'm so low that I object to accusing some one of being a pedophile unless there's some reasonable basis to think that they are in fact a pedophile. About the best that can be said about it is that it trivializes a horrific accusation. In the second place I'm so rough and tumble that I would talk about the filth you post to your face around the campfire.
TB
|
| Carl A. in FL | 06 Jul 2009 20:48 |
>>>>>> Dang Carl, that person is just a troll, but somehow you had to bring >>>>>> Hunter into the non-existent conversation. Naughty naughty. [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > TB Context. Sorry you can't grasp that. Go spank someone.
I don't think I'd want to share a campfire with you.
 Signature Carl A. in FL http://sky.prohosting.com/chainfl/
|
| Technobarbarian | 06 Jul 2009 19:43 |
>>>>> Dang Carl, that person is just a troll, but somehow you had to bring >>>>> Hunter into the non-existent conversation. Naughty naughty. [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > And please, for once be intellectually honest and do not quote out of > context. Unfortunately Google's group search isn't working at the moment, but here you go: http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Rec/rec.outdoors.rv-travel/2008-08/msg04 635.html
One of the fun things about stuff like that is that once you throw it out there it's allllllllll over the place. Of course the liver can insult that you've become known by is one of your own insults that backfired on you. Just because you're generally slightly more creative in your insults than a simple FU it doesn't elevate them or you any. So, again, which one of the 3 are you?
TB
|
| Carl A. in FL | 06 Jul 2009 17:52 |
>>>> Dang Carl, that person is just a troll, but somehow you had to bring >>>> Hunter into the non-existent conversation. Naughty naughty. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > TB I may answer your question in the spirit it was asked, provided that you show by example how I routinely engage in the practice of using Joe's kind of language.
And please, for once be intellectually honest and do not quote out of context.
Thank you.
 Signature Carl A. in FL http://sky.prohosting.com/chainfl/
|
| Technobarbarian | 06 Jul 2009 17:06 |
>>> Dang Carl, that person is just a troll, but somehow you had to bring >>> Hunter into the non-existent conversation. Naughty naughty. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > sluts, trash, and trolls - the type of people one really wouldn't want to > associate with. Sooooo, of the 3, which one does that make you?
TB
|
| Carl A. in FL | 06 Jul 2009 16:46 |
>> Dang Carl, that person is just a troll, but somehow you had to bring >> Hunter into the non-existent conversation. Naughty naughty. > Carl has some serious problems! > > Brian Absolutely. When Hunter wrote me "f.ck You," my world came to an end, and Joe's suggestion reopened the barely healed wounds that Hunter's suggestion had cut.
You see, I live in a world where such language is generally attributed to sluts, trash, and trolls - the type of people one really wouldn't want to associate with.
 Signature Carl A. in FL http://sky.prohosting.com/chainfl/
|
| Pegleg | 06 Jul 2009 15:35 |
> Dang Carl, that person is just a troll, but somehow you had to bring Hunter > into the non-existent conversation. Naughty naughty. Carl has some serious problems!
Brian
|
| Frank Howell | 06 Jul 2009 15:25 |
>> f.ck you and have an even nicer day, liver-can boy. Eat sh.t and die >> while you are at it. Are you the f.cking net nanny this week. If [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > You ought to get together with Hunter, she loves to talk the way you > do. Dang Carl, that person is just a troll, but somehow you had to bring Hunter into the non-existent conversation. Naughty naughty.
 Signature Frank Howell
|
| Carl A. in FL | 06 Jul 2009 01:18 |
> f.ck you and have an even nicer day, liver-can boy. Eat sh.t and die > while you are at it. Are you the f.cking net nanny this week. If so, > f.ck you again. In view of your demonstrated verbal skills, I assume I can safely conclude that you are a Liberal.
You ought to get together with Hunter, she loves to talk the way you do.
 Signature Carl A. in FL http://sky.prohosting.com/chainfl/
|
| Joe | 05 Jul 2009 22:12 |
>>>>>>>>> I hope not. Where are people who "camp" for the holidays and >>>>>>>>> weekends supposed to go? Expensive private CGs? Once we get our [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > Thank you and have a nice day. f.ck you and have an even nicer day, liver-can boy. Eat sh.t and die while you are at it. Are you the f.cking net nanny this week. If so, f.ck you again.
|
| Carl A. in FL | 05 Jul 2009 21:35 |
>>>>>>>> I hope not. Where are people who "camp" for the holidays and >>>>>>>> weekends supposed to go? Expensive private CGs? Once we get our [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > As good as your liver-can reports? Bet you can't quote one, can you?
Would you mind also quoting a single RV-related post you've made?
Thank you and have a nice day.
 Signature Carl A. in FL http://sky.prohosting.com/chainfl/
|
| Joe | 05 Jul 2009 21:29 |
>>>>>>> I hope not. Where are people who "camp" for the holidays and >>>>>>> weekends supposed to go? Expensive private CGs? Once we get our [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > You are, indeed, an invaluable RORT campfire participant. As good as your liver-can reports?
|
| Carl A. in FL | 05 Jul 2009 21:05 |
>>>>>> I hope not. Where are people who "camp" for the holidays and >>>>>> weekends supposed to go? Expensive private CGs? Once we get our [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > Most of us here in the South would prefer you stayed the f.ck in the > north where you came from. Thank you for your intelligent contribution to the discussion,
You are, indeed, an invaluable RORT campfire participant.
 Signature Carl A. in FL http://sky.prohosting.com/chainfl/
|
| Joe | 05 Jul 2009 19:03 |
>>>>> I hope not. Where are people who "camp" for the holidays and >>>>> weekends supposed to go? Expensive private CGs? Once we get our [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > >> LZ Most of us here in the South would prefer you stayed the f.ck in the north where you came from.
|
| D. Arlington | 05 Jul 2009 18:02 |
>>>> I hope not. Where are people who "camp" for the holidays and weekends >>>> supposed to go? Expensive private CGs? Once we get our senior [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > The Senior Passport is not honored in most state parks and COE parks are > sparse in many states. Here in TN there is no shortage and they all honor that passport. Our State and COE parks can't be beat. Large wooded sites, privacy, quiet at night, clean, wooded lakeside sites...... only thing missing is sewer hookups in most, but we've learned to use a minimum of water when camping.
I've traveled enough that I have my own list
> of favored spots. I usually stay west of the big river though. We'll be sticking mostly to the south and north east.
> LZ |
| Lone Haranguer | 05 Jul 2009 02:45 |
>>> I hope not. Where are people who "camp" for the holidays and weekends >>> supposed to go? Expensive private CGs? Once we get our senior [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Why? So far we've had much better experiences in State and COE CGs than > private CGs. The Senior Passport is not honored in most state parks and COE parks are sparse in many states. I've traveled enough that I have my own list of favored spots. I usually stay west of the big river though. LZ
|
| D. Arlington | 05 Jul 2009 01:43 |
>> I hope not. Where are people who "camp" for the holidays and weekends >> supposed to go? Expensive private CGs? Once we get our senior "passport" [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > You're in for some major disappointments. > LZ Why? So far we've had much better experiences in State and COE CGs than private CGs.
|
| Lone Haranguer | 03 Jul 2009 20:30 |
>> ************************************************ >> BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) - The recession is helping create a new [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > next week, we wont be using private CGs anymore - or will use them as > little as possible. You're in for some major disappointments. LZ
|
| D. Arlington | 03 Jul 2009 19:09 |
> ************************************************ > BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) - The recession is helping create a new lifestyle in [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Is the happening everywhere?? > Tom J I hope not. Where are people who "camp" for the holidays and weekends supposed to go? Expensive private CGs? Once we get our senior "passport" next week, we wont be using private CGs anymore - or will use them as little as possible.
|
| Tom J | 03 Jul 2009 16:10 |
************************************************ BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) - The recession is helping create a new lifestyle in Alabama: Permanent camping.
Campgrounds across Alabama are filling with permanent residents seeking less-stressful, less-expensive lifestyle. Campground operators say it's an enticing option for both retired people and younger adults who have fallen on hard times.
Alabama's state parks didn't allow full-time residents in its campgrounds for decades. But it now allows full-time residents at Lake Guntersville State Park and Wind Creek State Park near Alexander City.
State Parks Director Mark Easterwood said pressure from campers created the change. *************************************************
Is the happening everywhere?? Tom J
|
Quick links:
|
|
|